complexity of international law with its multitude of actors, as well as the increasingly sophisticated and varied modes of communication that are all put into play in
the regulation of international conduct and in the settlement of international disputes.
References
Alter KJ (2012) The multiple roles of international courts and tribunals: enforcement, dispute
settlement, constitutional and administrative review. In: Jeffrey LD, Mark AP (eds) International
law and international relations: synthesizing insights from interdisciplinary scholarship. Cambridge University Press, pp 345–370
Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Netherlands v. Russia) (Award, 14 August 2015) PCA Case No. 201402 (Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Award))
Beckman R (2013) The UN convention on the law of the sea and the maritime disputes in the South
China sea. Am J Int Law 107(1):142–163
Crawford J (2012) Brownlie’s principles of public international law, 8th edn. Oxford University
Press
Damrosch LF, Oxman BH (2013) Agora: the South China sea, editors introduction. Am J Int Law
107:95–97
Dispute Concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait (Ukraine
v. the Russian Federation) PCA Case No. 2017-06 (Black Sea Arbitration)
Driscoll K, Starik M (2004) The primordial stakeholder: advancing the conceptual consideration of
stakeholder status for the natural environment. J Bus Ethics 49:55–73
Duzgit Integrity Arbitration (Malta v. São Tomé and Príncipe) (Award, 5 September 2016) PCA
Case No 2014-07 (Duzgit Integrity Arbitration)
Eesley C, Lennox MJ (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strat Manag J
27:765–781
Elferink AGO (2016) The South China Sea Arbitration’s Interpretation of Article 121(3) of the
LOSC: A Disquieting First. JCLOS Blog. https://site.uit.no/jclos/2016/09/07/the-south-chinasea-arbitrations-interpretation-of-article-1213-of-the-losc-a-disquieting-first/
Etzioni A (1964) Modern organizations. Prentice-Hall
Falk R, Juergensmeyer M, Popovski V (eds) (2012) Legality and legitimacy in global affairs.
Oxford University Press
Franck TM (1995) Fairness in international law and institutions. Oxford University Press
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman
Grossman N (2012) Sex on the bench: do women judges matter to the legitimacy of international
courts. Chicago J Int Law 12:647–686
Guyana v Suriname (Award, 17 September 2007) PCA Case No. 2004-04 (Guyana v Suriname
Arbitration (Award))
Klein N (2016) Rocks and Islands after the South China sea arbitration. Aust Year Book Int Law
34:21–29
Klein N, Parlett K (2021) Judging the law of the sea: judicial contributions to the UN convention on
the law of the sea. Oxford University Press
Krasner SD (1982) Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables.
Int Organ 36(2):185–205
McDorman TL (2016) The South China sea arbitration. Am Soc Int Law Insight 20(17). https://
www.asil.org/insights/volume/20/issue/17/south-china-sea-arbitration
Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:
defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22:853–886
14 Stakeholders in Dispute Settlement Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea
259
the regulation of international conduct and in the settlement of international disputes.
References
Alter KJ (2012) The multiple roles of international courts and tribunals: enforcement, dispute
settlement, constitutional and administrative review. In: Jeffrey LD, Mark AP (eds) International
law and international relations: synthesizing insights from interdisciplinary scholarship. Cambridge University Press, pp 345–370
Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Netherlands v. Russia) (Award, 14 August 2015) PCA Case No. 201402 (Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Award))
Beckman R (2013) The UN convention on the law of the sea and the maritime disputes in the South
China sea. Am J Int Law 107(1):142–163
Crawford J (2012) Brownlie’s principles of public international law, 8th edn. Oxford University
Press
Damrosch LF, Oxman BH (2013) Agora: the South China sea, editors introduction. Am J Int Law
107:95–97
Dispute Concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait (Ukraine
v. the Russian Federation) PCA Case No. 2017-06 (Black Sea Arbitration)
Driscoll K, Starik M (2004) The primordial stakeholder: advancing the conceptual consideration of
stakeholder status for the natural environment. J Bus Ethics 49:55–73
Duzgit Integrity Arbitration (Malta v. São Tomé and Príncipe) (Award, 5 September 2016) PCA
Case No 2014-07 (Duzgit Integrity Arbitration)
Eesley C, Lennox MJ (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strat Manag J
27:765–781
Elferink AGO (2016) The South China Sea Arbitration’s Interpretation of Article 121(3) of the
LOSC: A Disquieting First. JCLOS Blog. https://site.uit.no/jclos/2016/09/07/the-south-chinasea-arbitrations-interpretation-of-article-1213-of-the-losc-a-disquieting-first/
Etzioni A (1964) Modern organizations. Prentice-Hall
Falk R, Juergensmeyer M, Popovski V (eds) (2012) Legality and legitimacy in global affairs.
Oxford University Press
Franck TM (1995) Fairness in international law and institutions. Oxford University Press
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman
Grossman N (2012) Sex on the bench: do women judges matter to the legitimacy of international
courts. Chicago J Int Law 12:647–686
Guyana v Suriname (Award, 17 September 2007) PCA Case No. 2004-04 (Guyana v Suriname
Arbitration (Award))
Klein N (2016) Rocks and Islands after the South China sea arbitration. Aust Year Book Int Law
34:21–29
Klein N, Parlett K (2021) Judging the law of the sea: judicial contributions to the UN convention on
the law of the sea. Oxford University Press
Krasner SD (1982) Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables.
Int Organ 36(2):185–205
McDorman TL (2016) The South China sea arbitration. Am Soc Int Law Insight 20(17). https://
www.asil.org/insights/volume/20/issue/17/south-china-sea-arbitration
Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:
defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22:853–886
14 Stakeholders in Dispute Settlement Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea
259