Townsend-Gault I (2014) The ‘territorialisation’ of the exclusive economic zone: a requiem for the
remnant of the freedom of the seas? In: The limits of Maritime Jurisdiction. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp
65–78
Trindade AAC (2010) Os tribunais internacionais contemporâneos e a busca da realização do ideal
da justiça internacional. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG 57:37–68
Trindade ACC (2014) Direito do Mar: indicações para a fxação dos limites laterais marítimos. In:
Reflexões Sobre a Convenção de Direito do Mar. FUNAG, Brasilia, pp 167–222
Ventura VAMF (2017) A força normativa do princípio do uso racional e sustentável dos recursos
naturais marinhos no Direito Internacional Ambiental e do Mar: soft norm ou regra cogente?
análise da jurisprudência do Tribunal Internacional de Direito do Mar. In: Direito do Mar:
reflexões, tendências e perspectivas. D’Plácido, Salvador, pp 615–652
Weber M (1978) Economy and society. University of California Press, Los Angeles
Wolfrum R (2008) The outer continental shelf: some considerations concerning applications and the
potential role of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Statement presented at the
73rd ILA Conference, Rio de Janeiro, August 21, 2008
Wolfrum R, Matz-Lück N (2000) The interplay of the United Nations Convention on the law of the
sea and the United Nations Convention on biological diversity. Max Planck Yearb U N Law
4:445–480
Young MA (ed) (2012) Regime interaction in international law: facing fragmentation. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge
Reports
ILA (2002) Preliminary report of the Committee on the Legal Issues of the Outer Continental Shelf.
International Law Association, New Delhi
ILA (2004) Legal issues of the outer continental shelf. International Law Association, Berlin
LEPLAC (2020) Plan for the assessment of the Brazilian continental shelf. https://www.marinha.
mil.br/secirm/leplac. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
UN (1950) Memorandum on the regime of the high seas, prepared by the Secretariat, Doc. A/CN.4/
32, 14 July 1950. Yearbook of the International Law Commission II (69). United Nations,
New York
UN (1956) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 8th Session, Doc. A/CN.4/102/Add.1,
II. United Nations, New York
UN (1989) The Law of the Sea. Baselines: an examination of the relevant provisions of the United
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Appendix I. Glossary of Technical Terms. United
Nations, New York
Jurisprudence
ICJ (1951) Fisheries (United Kingdom v. Norway). Judgement of 18 December 1951. International
Court of Justice Reports
ICJ (1969) North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federative Republic of Germany v. Denmark).
Judgment of 20 February 1969. International Court of Justice Reports
ITLOS (2012) Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Bangladesh
and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh v. Myanmar). Judgement of 14 March 2012,
ITLOS Reports
ITLOS (2015) ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v. India), Provisional Measures. Order of 24 August
2015. ITLOS Reports
46
2 The General International Legal Regime of the Continental Shelf
remnant of the freedom of the seas? In: The limits of Maritime Jurisdiction. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp
65–78
Trindade AAC (2010) Os tribunais internacionais contemporâneos e a busca da realização do ideal
da justiça internacional. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG 57:37–68
Trindade ACC (2014) Direito do Mar: indicações para a fxação dos limites laterais marítimos. In:
Reflexões Sobre a Convenção de Direito do Mar. FUNAG, Brasilia, pp 167–222
Ventura VAMF (2017) A força normativa do princípio do uso racional e sustentável dos recursos
naturais marinhos no Direito Internacional Ambiental e do Mar: soft norm ou regra cogente?
análise da jurisprudência do Tribunal Internacional de Direito do Mar. In: Direito do Mar:
reflexões, tendências e perspectivas. D’Plácido, Salvador, pp 615–652
Weber M (1978) Economy and society. University of California Press, Los Angeles
Wolfrum R (2008) The outer continental shelf: some considerations concerning applications and the
potential role of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Statement presented at the
73rd ILA Conference, Rio de Janeiro, August 21, 2008
Wolfrum R, Matz-Lück N (2000) The interplay of the United Nations Convention on the law of the
sea and the United Nations Convention on biological diversity. Max Planck Yearb U N Law
4:445–480
Young MA (ed) (2012) Regime interaction in international law: facing fragmentation. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge
Reports
ILA (2002) Preliminary report of the Committee on the Legal Issues of the Outer Continental Shelf.
International Law Association, New Delhi
ILA (2004) Legal issues of the outer continental shelf. International Law Association, Berlin
LEPLAC (2020) Plan for the assessment of the Brazilian continental shelf. https://www.marinha.
mil.br/secirm/leplac. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
UN (1950) Memorandum on the regime of the high seas, prepared by the Secretariat, Doc. A/CN.4/
32, 14 July 1950. Yearbook of the International Law Commission II (69). United Nations,
New York
UN (1956) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 8th Session, Doc. A/CN.4/102/Add.1,
II. United Nations, New York
UN (1989) The Law of the Sea. Baselines: an examination of the relevant provisions of the United
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Appendix I. Glossary of Technical Terms. United
Nations, New York
Jurisprudence
ICJ (1951) Fisheries (United Kingdom v. Norway). Judgement of 18 December 1951. International
Court of Justice Reports
ICJ (1969) North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federative Republic of Germany v. Denmark).
Judgment of 20 February 1969. International Court of Justice Reports
ITLOS (2012) Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Between Bangladesh
and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh v. Myanmar). Judgement of 14 March 2012,
ITLOS Reports
ITLOS (2015) ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v. India), Provisional Measures. Order of 24 August
2015. ITLOS Reports
46
2 The General International Legal Regime of the Continental Shelf