budgetary resources, the low availability of floating means for the shipment of
researchers for the collection and sorting of scientific samples, the lack of qualified
professionals for the processing and analysis of the material, the “apparent” lack of
harmony between the various normative acts related to Biotechnology, biodiversity,
genetic resources and biological materials.
168 This and other challenges are briefly
mentioned in the conclusions below, without any intention to exhaust the problems
lying ahead of the Brazilian “oceanic state”, and without meaning to offer solution to
all those marine environmental challenges.
References
Azzam I (1964) The dispute between France and Brazil over lobster fishing in the Atlantic. Int
Comp Law Q 13(4):1453–1459
Brady H (2017) First photos of new amazon coral reef system released. National Geographic,
January 30
Brown ED (1973) Maritime zones: a survey of claims. In: New Directions in the law of the sea. The
Eastern Press, London
Cavalcanti VMM (2011) Plataforma continental: a última fronteira da mineração brasileira.
Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral, Brasília
Chircop A (2004) Operationalizing article 82 of the United Nations Convention on the law of the
sea: a new role for the international seabed authority? Ocean Yearb 18:398–412
Churchill R, Lowe V (1999) The law of the sea. Manchester University Press, Manchester
ECORYS (2014) Study to investigate the state of knowledge of deep-sea mining, Final Report, SC
E1/2013/04
Farranha AC (2014) Minutiae of the GERN Workshop. University of Brasília, Brasília
Fellet J (2018) A desconhecida cordilheira no litoral brasileiro que pode virar a maior reserva
marinha do atlântico, BBC News
Gavouneli M (2014) State jurisdiction in relation to the protection and preservation of the marine
environment. In: The IMLI manual on international maritime law. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, Chapter 1
Geraque E (2006) Pesca de arrasto ameaça corais no Brasil, Jornal Folha de São Paulo, 23 October,
Available at https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/ciencia/fe2310200601.htm. Accessed 12 Apr
2020
Gianni M (2004) High seas bottom trawl fisheries and their impacts on the biodiversity of
vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems: options for international action. IUCN, Gland
Goodwin EJ (2011) International Environmental Law and the conservation of coral reefs.
Routledge Research in International Environmental Law, UK
Hart P (2010) Montara oil spill: a failure of sensible oilfield practice. The Oil Drum, 8 December
Huh N (2017) Article 246. In: Proelss A (ed) UNCLOS: a commentary. C.H. Beck, Nomos Verlag,
Baden-Baden
Jayakumar S (2013) The continental shelf regime under UNCLOS In: The regulation of continental
shelf development: rethinking international standards. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 1–12
Kelsen H (2017) Reine Rechtslehre. Mit Einem Anhang: Das Problem Der Gerechtigkeit, 2nd ed,
Hrsg. von Matthias Jestaedt, Mohr-Siebeck, Tübingen
168 Rippel (2014), p. 45.
References
349
researchers for the collection and sorting of scientific samples, the lack of qualified
professionals for the processing and analysis of the material, the “apparent” lack of
harmony between the various normative acts related to Biotechnology, biodiversity,
genetic resources and biological materials.
168 This and other challenges are briefly
mentioned in the conclusions below, without any intention to exhaust the problems
lying ahead of the Brazilian “oceanic state”, and without meaning to offer solution to
all those marine environmental challenges.
References
Azzam I (1964) The dispute between France and Brazil over lobster fishing in the Atlantic. Int
Comp Law Q 13(4):1453–1459
Brady H (2017) First photos of new amazon coral reef system released. National Geographic,
January 30
Brown ED (1973) Maritime zones: a survey of claims. In: New Directions in the law of the sea. The
Eastern Press, London
Cavalcanti VMM (2011) Plataforma continental: a última fronteira da mineração brasileira.
Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral, Brasília
Chircop A (2004) Operationalizing article 82 of the United Nations Convention on the law of the
sea: a new role for the international seabed authority? Ocean Yearb 18:398–412
Churchill R, Lowe V (1999) The law of the sea. Manchester University Press, Manchester
ECORYS (2014) Study to investigate the state of knowledge of deep-sea mining, Final Report, SC
E1/2013/04
Farranha AC (2014) Minutiae of the GERN Workshop. University of Brasília, Brasília
Fellet J (2018) A desconhecida cordilheira no litoral brasileiro que pode virar a maior reserva
marinha do atlântico, BBC News
Gavouneli M (2014) State jurisdiction in relation to the protection and preservation of the marine
environment. In: The IMLI manual on international maritime law. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, Chapter 1
Geraque E (2006) Pesca de arrasto ameaça corais no Brasil, Jornal Folha de São Paulo, 23 October,
Available at https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/ciencia/fe2310200601.htm. Accessed 12 Apr
2020
Gianni M (2004) High seas bottom trawl fisheries and their impacts on the biodiversity of
vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems: options for international action. IUCN, Gland
Goodwin EJ (2011) International Environmental Law and the conservation of coral reefs.
Routledge Research in International Environmental Law, UK
Hart P (2010) Montara oil spill: a failure of sensible oilfield practice. The Oil Drum, 8 December
Huh N (2017) Article 246. In: Proelss A (ed) UNCLOS: a commentary. C.H. Beck, Nomos Verlag,
Baden-Baden
Jayakumar S (2013) The continental shelf regime under UNCLOS In: The regulation of continental
shelf development: rethinking international standards. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 1–12
Kelsen H (2017) Reine Rechtslehre. Mit Einem Anhang: Das Problem Der Gerechtigkeit, 2nd ed,
Hrsg. von Matthias Jestaedt, Mohr-Siebeck, Tübingen
168 Rippel (2014), p. 45.
References
349