Fenton B (2007) How Britannia was allowed to rule the waves. “The Telegraph” Newspaper. http://
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1538569/How-Britannia-was-allowed-to-rule-the-waves.
html. Accessed 10 Apr 2020
Fidler DP (2003) Revolt against or from within the West? TWAIL, the developing world, and the
future direction of international law. Chin J Int Law 2:29–76
Franckx E (1998) Regional marine environment protection regimes in the context of UNСLOS. Int
J Mar Coast Law 13(3):307–324
Franckx E (2005) The 200-mile limit: between creeping jurisdiction and creeping common heritage.
Germ Yearb Int Law 48:117–149
Frank V (2005) Consequences of the prestige sinking for European and international law. Int J Mar
Coast Law 20:1–64
Fraser HS (1925) Extent and delimitation of territorial waters. Cornell Law Q 11:455–480
Freestone D (2012) International governance, responsibility and management of areas beyond
national jurisdiction. Int J Mar Coast Law 27(2):191–204
Galiano E (2003) In the wake of the Prestige disaster: is an earlier phase-out of single-hulled oil
tankers the answer? Tulane Marit Law J 28:113–133
Garcia-Amador FV (1974) The Latin American contribution to the development of the law of the
sea. AJIL 68(1):33–50
Gavouneli M (2006) From uniformity to fragmentation: the ability of the UN convention on the
Law of the Sea to accommodate new uses and challenges. In: Unresolved issues and new
challenges to the Law of the Sea: time before and time after. Nijhoff, Leiden
Gavouneli M (2007) Functional jurisdiction in the law of the sea. Publications on Ocean Development, vol 62. Nijhoff, Leiden
Goldsmith JL, Posner EA (2005) The limits of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248
Ikeshima T (2011) Is the freedom of the high seas under threat from marine protected areas?
Environmental protection versus security interests under international law. Waseda Global
Forum 8:5–30
Kaye S (2006) Freedom of navigation in a post 9/11 world: security and creeping jurisdiction. In:
Law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 347–364
Knauss JA (1985) Creeping jurisdiction and customary international law. Ocean Dev Int Law J 15
(2):209–216
Knight G (1981) Legal aspects of current United States Law of the Sea Policy. Paper presented to
American Enterprise Institute Conference on United States Interests in the Law of the Sea,
19 October 1981
Koskenniemi M (2005) International law in Europe: between tradition and renewal. Eur J Int Law
16:113–124
Koskenniemi M (2012) Hegemonic regimes. In: Regime interaction in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–324
Kraska J (2011) Maritime power and the law of the sea: expeditionary operations in world politics.
Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kreca M (2002) A few remarks on the theoretical basis of the new law of the sea. In: Liber
Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, Nijhoff, Leiden, vol II, pp 1207–1216
Krisch N (2010) Global administrative law and the constitutional ambition. In: Dobner P, Loughlin
M (eds) The twilight of constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kunz LJ (1958) Continental shelf and international law: confusion and abuse. AJIL 50(4):828–853
Kwiatkowska B (1991) Creeping jurisdiction beyond 200 miles in the light of the 1982 Law of the
Sea Convention and State Practice. Ocean Dev Int Law 22(2):153–187
Lagoni R (2003) Marine protected areas in the exclusive economic zone. In: International Marine
Environmental Law: Institutions, Implementation and Innovations Kluwer Law, Leiden
Langewiesche W (2003) Anarchy at sea. The Atlantic Monthly, September, 50–80
Leff E (1998) Saber ambiental: sustentabilidad, racionalidad, conplejidad, Poder. Siglo Veintiuno
Editores, Mexico
186
6 Creeping Jurisdiction in the Law of the Sea: Threat to Navigational Freedoms or. . .
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1538569/How-Britannia-was-allowed-to-rule-the-waves.
html. Accessed 10 Apr 2020
Fidler DP (2003) Revolt against or from within the West? TWAIL, the developing world, and the
future direction of international law. Chin J Int Law 2:29–76
Franckx E (1998) Regional marine environment protection regimes in the context of UNСLOS. Int
J Mar Coast Law 13(3):307–324
Franckx E (2005) The 200-mile limit: between creeping jurisdiction and creeping common heritage.
Germ Yearb Int Law 48:117–149
Frank V (2005) Consequences of the prestige sinking for European and international law. Int J Mar
Coast Law 20:1–64
Fraser HS (1925) Extent and delimitation of territorial waters. Cornell Law Q 11:455–480
Freestone D (2012) International governance, responsibility and management of areas beyond
national jurisdiction. Int J Mar Coast Law 27(2):191–204
Galiano E (2003) In the wake of the Prestige disaster: is an earlier phase-out of single-hulled oil
tankers the answer? Tulane Marit Law J 28:113–133
Garcia-Amador FV (1974) The Latin American contribution to the development of the law of the
sea. AJIL 68(1):33–50
Gavouneli M (2006) From uniformity to fragmentation: the ability of the UN convention on the
Law of the Sea to accommodate new uses and challenges. In: Unresolved issues and new
challenges to the Law of the Sea: time before and time after. Nijhoff, Leiden
Gavouneli M (2007) Functional jurisdiction in the law of the sea. Publications on Ocean Development, vol 62. Nijhoff, Leiden
Goldsmith JL, Posner EA (2005) The limits of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248
Ikeshima T (2011) Is the freedom of the high seas under threat from marine protected areas?
Environmental protection versus security interests under international law. Waseda Global
Forum 8:5–30
Kaye S (2006) Freedom of navigation in a post 9/11 world: security and creeping jurisdiction. In:
Law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 347–364
Knauss JA (1985) Creeping jurisdiction and customary international law. Ocean Dev Int Law J 15
(2):209–216
Knight G (1981) Legal aspects of current United States Law of the Sea Policy. Paper presented to
American Enterprise Institute Conference on United States Interests in the Law of the Sea,
19 October 1981
Koskenniemi M (2005) International law in Europe: between tradition and renewal. Eur J Int Law
16:113–124
Koskenniemi M (2012) Hegemonic regimes. In: Regime interaction in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–324
Kraska J (2011) Maritime power and the law of the sea: expeditionary operations in world politics.
Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kreca M (2002) A few remarks on the theoretical basis of the new law of the sea. In: Liber
Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, Nijhoff, Leiden, vol II, pp 1207–1216
Krisch N (2010) Global administrative law and the constitutional ambition. In: Dobner P, Loughlin
M (eds) The twilight of constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kunz LJ (1958) Continental shelf and international law: confusion and abuse. AJIL 50(4):828–853
Kwiatkowska B (1991) Creeping jurisdiction beyond 200 miles in the light of the 1982 Law of the
Sea Convention and State Practice. Ocean Dev Int Law 22(2):153–187
Lagoni R (2003) Marine protected areas in the exclusive economic zone. In: International Marine
Environmental Law: Institutions, Implementation and Innovations Kluwer Law, Leiden
Langewiesche W (2003) Anarchy at sea. The Atlantic Monthly, September, 50–80
Leff E (1998) Saber ambiental: sustentabilidad, racionalidad, conplejidad, Poder. Siglo Veintiuno
Editores, Mexico
186
6 Creeping Jurisdiction in the Law of the Sea: Threat to Navigational Freedoms or. . .