Contesting Cyberspace and the Coming Crisis of Authority
27
require venture capital or a leased offi ce space and a large staff; it requires intelligence,
boldness, and access to the Internet through a cheap consumer device.
Just as the social setting of universities and West Coast libertarian culture of the
early Internet technologists infl uenced the constitutive values that informed cyberspace, so too will the much different social setting of the next generation of digital
natives. At present, the Asian region comprises 42 percent of the world ’ s Internet
population (the most by region), but it ranks only sixth in terms of penetration rates
at 21.4 percent, meaning that there is an enormous population yet to be connected,
most of them young.
18 In China, for example, 60 percent of Internet users are under
the age of 30.
19 According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU),
among the roughly 5.3 billion mobile subscriptions by the end of 2010, 3.8 billion
are in the developing world.
20 It is important, although perhaps disturbing, to know
that of the top 55 countries with the highest Internet penetration growth rates from
2008 to 2009,
21 18 are considered by the United Nations to be the world ’ s least
developed countries, “ representing the poorest and weakest of the international
community. ”
22
To understand the future of cyberspace, we need to understand the aspirations and
needs of this next generation. From the crumbling tenements of the former Soviet
Union, from the shantytowns of Nairobi, Manila, or Brazil, or from the crowded
Internet caf é s of Shanghai, a new wave of users is entering into the cyberspace domain.
With them will come an entirely fresh suite of ideas, interests, and strategic priorities.
Although not as wealthy in absolute terms, these actors are as smart and motivated
as their Silicon Valley predecessors. And they are exploiting opportunities for economic advancement that follow different rules. At least a signifi cant proportion of
them realize that playing through the gray areas of sovereign state jurisdiction and
the virtually endless methods of obfuscation can render law enforcement meaningless,
allowing them to work in relative impunity in the profi table world of cybercrime
(which we outline in the next section).
Not only are the demographic shifts that occur in cyberspace bringing new motivations and desires, but they are also bringing the weight of entire national collective
identities and state interests hitherto largely absent or irrelevant to cyberspace governance issues. Although English has been the “ operating system language ” for the
Internet since its inception, if present growth rates continue Chinese will be the
dominant language on the Internet in fi ve years.
23 Such a shift alone will have repercussions for how cyberspace is constituted as a public commons of information.
24 But
more practically, it will begin (and already has begun) to put pressure on the governance of cyberspace routing. Already, the desire to encourage linguistic communities
to express themselves online has triggered serious questions about how the systems
that support them are managed and resources allocated, particularly around allocation
and management of country top-level domains. What was once a purely technical
27
require venture capital or a leased offi ce space and a large staff; it requires intelligence,
boldness, and access to the Internet through a cheap consumer device.
Just as the social setting of universities and West Coast libertarian culture of the
early Internet technologists infl uenced the constitutive values that informed cyberspace, so too will the much different social setting of the next generation of digital
natives. At present, the Asian region comprises 42 percent of the world ’ s Internet
population (the most by region), but it ranks only sixth in terms of penetration rates
at 21.4 percent, meaning that there is an enormous population yet to be connected,
most of them young.
18 In China, for example, 60 percent of Internet users are under
the age of 30.
19 According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU),
among the roughly 5.3 billion mobile subscriptions by the end of 2010, 3.8 billion
are in the developing world.
20 It is important, although perhaps disturbing, to know
that of the top 55 countries with the highest Internet penetration growth rates from
2008 to 2009,
21 18 are considered by the United Nations to be the world ’ s least
developed countries, “ representing the poorest and weakest of the international
community. ”
22
To understand the future of cyberspace, we need to understand the aspirations and
needs of this next generation. From the crumbling tenements of the former Soviet
Union, from the shantytowns of Nairobi, Manila, or Brazil, or from the crowded
Internet caf é s of Shanghai, a new wave of users is entering into the cyberspace domain.
With them will come an entirely fresh suite of ideas, interests, and strategic priorities.
Although not as wealthy in absolute terms, these actors are as smart and motivated
as their Silicon Valley predecessors. And they are exploiting opportunities for economic advancement that follow different rules. At least a signifi cant proportion of
them realize that playing through the gray areas of sovereign state jurisdiction and
the virtually endless methods of obfuscation can render law enforcement meaningless,
allowing them to work in relative impunity in the profi table world of cybercrime
(which we outline in the next section).
Not only are the demographic shifts that occur in cyberspace bringing new motivations and desires, but they are also bringing the weight of entire national collective
identities and state interests hitherto largely absent or irrelevant to cyberspace governance issues. Although English has been the “ operating system language ” for the
Internet since its inception, if present growth rates continue Chinese will be the
dominant language on the Internet in fi ve years.
23 Such a shift alone will have repercussions for how cyberspace is constituted as a public commons of information.
24 But
more practically, it will begin (and already has begun) to put pressure on the governance of cyberspace routing. Already, the desire to encourage linguistic communities
to express themselves online has triggered serious questions about how the systems
that support them are managed and resources allocated, particularly around allocation
and management of country top-level domains. What was once a purely technical