504
S. Grund and E. van Genderen
3. United Nations “Paris Agreement” (2015) Available online at https://unfccc.int/sites/default/
files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
4. OECD (2019) Global material resources outlook to 2060: economic drivers and environmental consequences. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available online at https://doi.org/10.1787/
9789264307452-en
5. OECD (2011) OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Available online at http://www.
oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/48004323.pdf
6. ILZSG (2019) Statistical data base. http://www.ilzsg.org/static/statistics.aspx?from=1, downloaded at 27.9.2019
7. Maréchal L (2019) OECD due diligence guidance on responsible supply chains of minerals.
In: Presentation at Eurometaux Trade Committee. 7 May 2019
8. IZA (2018) About cycles, recycling, and circular economy. Available online at https://
sustainability.zinc.org/recycling/
9. Krüger J et al Sachbilanz Zink. Aachen 2001, Mainz-Verlag 2002, ISBN 3-89653-939-6
10. Reuter MA, van Schaik A, Gutzmer J, Bartie N, Abadías-Llamas A (2019) Challenges of the
circular economy: a material, metallurgical, and product design perspective. Annu Rev Mater
Res 49:253–274
11. Bergische Unversität Wuppertal/bauforumstahl (2015) Sachstandsbericht zum Stahlrecycling im Bauwesen. Manfred Helmus. Available online at https://bauforumstahl.de/upload/
documents/nachhaltigkeit/Sachstandsbericht.pdf
12. Piret NL (2012) EAF dust processing: rotary hearth a potential substitute for the waelz kiln?
World Metall Erzmetall 65(5):306–316
13. Jorge J (2015) Secondary zinc as part of the supply chain and the rise of EAF dust recycling.
In: ILZSG 19th zinc & its markets seminar. Helsinki, Finland. 6 May 2015
14. Grund S, Schönnenbeck M (2011) “Lebenslänglich“, Dachbaumagazin 12/2011, pp 48–49
15. Maximizing value: guidance on implementing materials stewardship in the minerals and
stewardship/maximizing-value-guidance-on-implementing-materials-stewardship-in-theminerals-and-metals-value-chain
16. IZA (2018) Resources and guiding principles. https://sustainability.zinc.org/resources/
17. Meylan G, Reck BK (2017) The anthropogenic cycle of zinc: status quo and perspectives.
Resour Conserv Recycl 123:1–10
18. Meylan G, Reck BK (2017) The anthropogenic cycle of zinc: status quo and perspectives. Res
Conserv Recycl 123:1–10
19. Blanpain B, Reuter M, Malfliet A (2019) Lead metallurgy is fundamental to the circular
economy. Socrates Policy Brief, Feb 2019
20. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Available online at https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html
21. EU Single Market for Green Products Initiative. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/
environment/eussd/smgp/index.htm. Status Jan 2019
22. Van Genderen E et al (2016) A global life cycle assessment for primary zinc production. Int J
Life Cycle Assess 21:1580–1593
23. Johannes A. Drielsma et al (2016) Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment—defining
the path forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(1):85–105. Available online at https://link.springer.
com/article/10.1007/s11367-015-0991-7
24. Grund S, van Genderen E, van Leeuwen M (2019) Circular economy—recycling at all costs?
Zinc: unleashing valuable resources. In: Proceedings of EMC2019, published by GDMB in
2019
25. Ellen McArthur Foundation (2015) Granata design and life: circularity indicators—an
approach to measuring circularity. Available online at https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.
org/resources/apply/circularity-indicators
26. van Schaik A, Reuter MA (2016) Recycling indices visualizing the performance of the circular
economy. World Metall Erzmetall 69(4):5–20
S. Grund and E. van Genderen
3. United Nations “Paris Agreement” (2015) Available online at https://unfccc.int/sites/default/
files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
4. OECD (2019) Global material resources outlook to 2060: economic drivers and environmental consequences. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available online at https://doi.org/10.1787/
9789264307452-en
5. OECD (2011) OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Available online at http://www.
oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/48004323.pdf
6. ILZSG (2019) Statistical data base. http://www.ilzsg.org/static/statistics.aspx?from=1, downloaded at 27.9.2019
7. Maréchal L (2019) OECD due diligence guidance on responsible supply chains of minerals.
In: Presentation at Eurometaux Trade Committee. 7 May 2019
8. IZA (2018) About cycles, recycling, and circular economy. Available online at https://
sustainability.zinc.org/recycling/
9. Krüger J et al Sachbilanz Zink. Aachen 2001, Mainz-Verlag 2002, ISBN 3-89653-939-6
10. Reuter MA, van Schaik A, Gutzmer J, Bartie N, Abadías-Llamas A (2019) Challenges of the
circular economy: a material, metallurgical, and product design perspective. Annu Rev Mater
Res 49:253–274
11. Bergische Unversität Wuppertal/bauforumstahl (2015) Sachstandsbericht zum Stahlrecycling im Bauwesen. Manfred Helmus. Available online at https://bauforumstahl.de/upload/
documents/nachhaltigkeit/Sachstandsbericht.pdf
12. Piret NL (2012) EAF dust processing: rotary hearth a potential substitute for the waelz kiln?
World Metall Erzmetall 65(5):306–316
13. Jorge J (2015) Secondary zinc as part of the supply chain and the rise of EAF dust recycling.
In: ILZSG 19th zinc & its markets seminar. Helsinki, Finland. 6 May 2015
14. Grund S, Schönnenbeck M (2011) “Lebenslänglich“, Dachbaumagazin 12/2011, pp 48–49
15. Maximizing value: guidance on implementing materials stewardship in the minerals and
stewardship/maximizing-value-guidance-on-implementing-materials-stewardship-in-theminerals-and-metals-value-chain
16. IZA (2018) Resources and guiding principles. https://sustainability.zinc.org/resources/
17. Meylan G, Reck BK (2017) The anthropogenic cycle of zinc: status quo and perspectives.
Resour Conserv Recycl 123:1–10
18. Meylan G, Reck BK (2017) The anthropogenic cycle of zinc: status quo and perspectives. Res
Conserv Recycl 123:1–10
19. Blanpain B, Reuter M, Malfliet A (2019) Lead metallurgy is fundamental to the circular
economy. Socrates Policy Brief, Feb 2019
20. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Available online at https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html
21. EU Single Market for Green Products Initiative. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/
environment/eussd/smgp/index.htm. Status Jan 2019
22. Van Genderen E et al (2016) A global life cycle assessment for primary zinc production. Int J
Life Cycle Assess 21:1580–1593
23. Johannes A. Drielsma et al (2016) Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment—defining
the path forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(1):85–105. Available online at https://link.springer.
com/article/10.1007/s11367-015-0991-7
24. Grund S, van Genderen E, van Leeuwen M (2019) Circular economy—recycling at all costs?
Zinc: unleashing valuable resources. In: Proceedings of EMC2019, published by GDMB in
2019
25. Ellen McArthur Foundation (2015) Granata design and life: circularity indicators—an
approach to measuring circularity. Available online at https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.
org/resources/apply/circularity-indicators
26. van Schaik A, Reuter MA (2016) Recycling indices visualizing the performance of the circular
economy. World Metall Erzmetall 69(4):5–20