Bleyen L (2016) Judicial sales of ships: a comparative study, Hamburg studies on Maritime Affairs,
vol 36. International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of
Hamburg, Springer International Publishing, New York
Bühler PA (2018) US polar policy and implementation and interpretation of the Polar Code,
background, practice and prognosis. J Int Maritime Law 24(6):483–499
Carey L (2017) All hands off deck? The legal barriers to autonomous ships. J Int Maritime Law
23:202
Chami DE (2018) Buques Autónomos. Revista de Estudios Marítimos (59)
Chircop A (2012) Regulatory challenges for International Arctic Navigation and Shipping in an
evolving Governance environment. Presentation at the CMI Conference in Beijing (Peoples
Republic of China). Available on the CMI website comitemaritime.org, under Work, Polar
Shipping
Chircop A (2016) Jurisdiction over ice-covered areas and the Polar Code: an emerging symbiotic
relationship. J Int Maritime Law 22:275
Chircop A, Pamel PG, Czarski M (2018) Canada’s implementation of the Polar Code. J Int
Maritime Law 24(6):428–450
Chuah J (2016) The EMSA’s overview of marine casualties and incidents 2016. J Int Maritime Law
501
CMI, Position Paper on Unmanned Ships and the International Regulatory Framework, available
at the CMI website under Work, Unmanned Ships
CMI International Working Group on polar shipping (2017) The legal framework for civil liability
for vessel-source oil spills in the polar regions, Working paper (October 2017 version).
Available on the CMI website comitemaritime.org, under Work, Polar Shipping
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, 2009
Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001
Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976 as amended by the 2002 Protocol
thereto
Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution
Damage, 1992
CORE Advokatfirma, Aarhus (Denmark) and the Nordic Association of Marine Insurers (CEFOR),
Oslo (Norway) (2018) Maritime autonomous surface ships, Zooming in on civil liability and
insurance, December 2018. Available on the International Group’s website at igpandi.org
Danish Maritime Authority (2017) “Analysis of Regulation Barriers to the Use of Autonomous
Ships”, report dated December 2017 submitted to the MSC (MSC 99/INF.3))
Daum O, Stellpflug T (2017) The implications of international law on unmanned merchant vessels.
J Int Maritime Law 23:363
Directive 2004/35/EC
Directive 2013/30/EU
Eder B (2018) Unmanned vessels, challenges ahead. 2019 Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law
Quarterly, p 47, Il Diritto Marittimo issue IV 2018, p 787 and CMI Yearbook 2017/2018, p 370
Fedi L, Faury O (2016) Les principaux enjeux et impacts du Code polaire OMI. Le Droit Maritime
Français, p 323
Guidelines for Cruise Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Resolution A.1024(26)), 2009
Guidelines for Ships Operating in Arctic Ice-covered Waters (MSC/Circ. 1056), 2002
Guidelines for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Resolution A.1024(26)), 2009
Guidelines on Voyage Planning for Passenger Ships Operating in Remote Areas (Resolution A.999
(25)), 2007
Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA) (2018) “Seafarers and digital disruption –
The effects of autonomous ships on the work at sea, the role of seafarers and the shipping
industry”, Study dated October 2018 prepared for the International Chamber of Shipping
Hetherington S (2014) The CMI and the Panacea of uniformity. Tulane Maritime Law J 39(1):159
IMO Doc. FAL 43/20
IMO Doc. LEG 99/14 section 13
What Challenges Lie Ahead for Maritime Law?
285
vol 36. International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of
Hamburg, Springer International Publishing, New York
Bühler PA (2018) US polar policy and implementation and interpretation of the Polar Code,
background, practice and prognosis. J Int Maritime Law 24(6):483–499
Carey L (2017) All hands off deck? The legal barriers to autonomous ships. J Int Maritime Law
23:202
Chami DE (2018) Buques Autónomos. Revista de Estudios Marítimos (59)
Chircop A (2012) Regulatory challenges for International Arctic Navigation and Shipping in an
evolving Governance environment. Presentation at the CMI Conference in Beijing (Peoples
Republic of China). Available on the CMI website comitemaritime.org, under Work, Polar
Shipping
Chircop A (2016) Jurisdiction over ice-covered areas and the Polar Code: an emerging symbiotic
relationship. J Int Maritime Law 22:275
Chircop A, Pamel PG, Czarski M (2018) Canada’s implementation of the Polar Code. J Int
Maritime Law 24(6):428–450
Chuah J (2016) The EMSA’s overview of marine casualties and incidents 2016. J Int Maritime Law
501
CMI, Position Paper on Unmanned Ships and the International Regulatory Framework, available
at the CMI website under Work, Unmanned Ships
CMI International Working Group on polar shipping (2017) The legal framework for civil liability
for vessel-source oil spills in the polar regions, Working paper (October 2017 version).
Available on the CMI website comitemaritime.org, under Work, Polar Shipping
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, 2009
Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001
Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976 as amended by the 2002 Protocol
thereto
Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution
Damage, 1992
CORE Advokatfirma, Aarhus (Denmark) and the Nordic Association of Marine Insurers (CEFOR),
Oslo (Norway) (2018) Maritime autonomous surface ships, Zooming in on civil liability and
insurance, December 2018. Available on the International Group’s website at igpandi.org
Danish Maritime Authority (2017) “Analysis of Regulation Barriers to the Use of Autonomous
Ships”, report dated December 2017 submitted to the MSC (MSC 99/INF.3))
Daum O, Stellpflug T (2017) The implications of international law on unmanned merchant vessels.
J Int Maritime Law 23:363
Directive 2004/35/EC
Directive 2013/30/EU
Eder B (2018) Unmanned vessels, challenges ahead. 2019 Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law
Quarterly, p 47, Il Diritto Marittimo issue IV 2018, p 787 and CMI Yearbook 2017/2018, p 370
Fedi L, Faury O (2016) Les principaux enjeux et impacts du Code polaire OMI. Le Droit Maritime
Français, p 323
Guidelines for Cruise Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Resolution A.1024(26)), 2009
Guidelines for Ships Operating in Arctic Ice-covered Waters (MSC/Circ. 1056), 2002
Guidelines for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Resolution A.1024(26)), 2009
Guidelines on Voyage Planning for Passenger Ships Operating in Remote Areas (Resolution A.999
(25)), 2007
Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA) (2018) “Seafarers and digital disruption –
The effects of autonomous ships on the work at sea, the role of seafarers and the shipping
industry”, Study dated October 2018 prepared for the International Chamber of Shipping
Hetherington S (2014) The CMI and the Panacea of uniformity. Tulane Maritime Law J 39(1):159
IMO Doc. FAL 43/20
IMO Doc. LEG 99/14 section 13
What Challenges Lie Ahead for Maritime Law?
285