37
the interests of the international community)
139
and, therefore, the new forms of
“sovereigntism”, imperialism and unilateralism that, in recent years, have unfortunately characterized the external relations of an ever-increasing number of States.
References
Ascensio H (2018) Faut-il mettre la pratique dans des catégories? (à propos des travaux de la CDI
sur l’interprétations des traités dans le temps). www.qil-qdi.org, 19–27
Bonafé BI (2017) Maritime delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). Am J Int Law
111:725–731
Caligiuri A (2018) L’arbitrato nella Convenzione delle Nazioni Unite sul diritto del mare. Editoriale
Scientifica, Napoli
Capotorti F (1984) Il diritto dei trattati secondo la Convenzione di Vienna. In: SIOI, Convenzione
di Vienna sul diritto dei trattati. CEDAM, Padova, pp 9–80
Carreau D, Marrella F (2018) Diritto internazionale, 2nd edn. Giuffrè, Milano
Crema L (2017) La prassi successiva e l’interpretazione del diritto internazionale scritto. Giuffrè,
Milano
Del Vecchio A (2013) International courts and tribunals between globalisation and localism.
Eleven International Publishing, The Hague
Distefano G (2011) L’interprétation évolutive de la norme internationale. Revue générale de droit
international public 115:373–396
Dörr O (2018) Article 31. In: Dörr O, Schmalenbach K (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of
Treaties – a commentary. Springer, Berlin, pp 559–616
Gardiner R (2015) Treaty interpretation, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kadelbach S (2018) International Law Commission and role of subsequent practice as a means of
interpretation under articles 31 and 32 VCLT. www.qil-qdi.org, 5–18
Karaman IV (2012) Dispute resolution in the law of the sea. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
Klein N (2005) Dispute settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge
Kojima C (2017) South China Sea arbitration and the protection of the marine environment: evolution of UNCLOS part XII through interpretation and the duty to cooperate. Asian Yearb Int
Law 21:166–180
Kolb R (2000) La bonne foi en droit international public. Presses universitaires de France, Paris
Lavranos N (2006) Protecting its exclusive jurisdiction: the MOX Plant judgment of the ECJ. Law
Pract Int Courts Tribunals 5:479–493
Linderfalk U (2018) What are the functions of the general principles? Good faith and international
legal pragmatism. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerecht 78:1–32
McLachlan C (2005) The principle of systemic integration and article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna
Convention. Int Comp Law Q 54:279–320
Nolte G (ed) (2013) Treaties and subsequent practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
O’Brien K (2017) Article 300. In: Proelss A (ed) United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea – a commentary. C.H. Beck/Hart/Nomos, München/London/Baden-Baden, pp 1937–1943
Paik J-H (2015) The origin of the principle of natural prolongation: North Sea Continental Shelf
cases revisited. In: del Castillo L (ed) Law of the sea, from Grotius to the International Tribunal
for the Law of the Sea. Liber amicorum Judge Hugo Caminos. Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publisher,
Leiden/Boston pp 583–594
Parlett K (2017) Beyond the four corners of the convention: expanding the scope of jurisdiction of
law of the sea tribunals. Ocean Dev Int Law 48:284–299
139 For a discussion of new forms of creeping jurisdiction, see Virzo (2014).
The ‘General Rule of Interpretation’ in the International Jurisprudence Relating…
Précédent

- 45/437

Suivant