37
the interests of the international community)
139
and, therefore, the new forms of
“sovereigntism”, imperialism and unilateralism that, in recent years, have unfortunately characterized the external relations of an ever-increasing number of States.
References
Ascensio H (2018) Faut-il mettre la pratique dans des catégories? (à propos des travaux de la CDI
sur l’interprétations des traités dans le temps). www.qil-qdi.org, 19–27
Bonafé BI (2017) Maritime delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). Am J Int Law
111:725–731
Caligiuri A (2018) L’arbitrato nella Convenzione delle Nazioni Unite sul diritto del mare. Editoriale
Scientifica, Napoli
Capotorti F (1984) Il diritto dei trattati secondo la Convenzione di Vienna. In: SIOI, Convenzione
di Vienna sul diritto dei trattati. CEDAM, Padova, pp 9–80
Carreau D, Marrella F (2018) Diritto internazionale, 2nd edn. Giuffrè, Milano
Crema L (2017) La prassi successiva e l’interpretazione del diritto internazionale scritto. Giuffrè,
Milano
Del Vecchio A (2013) International courts and tribunals between globalisation and localism.
Eleven International Publishing, The Hague
Distefano G (2011) L’interprétation évolutive de la norme internationale. Revue générale de droit
international public 115:373–396
Dörr O (2018) Article 31. In: Dörr O, Schmalenbach K (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of
Treaties – a commentary. Springer, Berlin, pp 559–616
Gardiner R (2015) Treaty interpretation, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kadelbach S (2018) International Law Commission and role of subsequent practice as a means of
interpretation under articles 31 and 32 VCLT. www.qil-qdi.org, 5–18
Karaman IV (2012) Dispute resolution in the law of the sea. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
Klein N (2005) Dispute settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge
Kojima C (2017) South China Sea arbitration and the protection of the marine environment: evolution of UNCLOS part XII through interpretation and the duty to cooperate. Asian Yearb Int
Law 21:166–180
Kolb R (2000) La bonne foi en droit international public. Presses universitaires de France, Paris
Lavranos N (2006) Protecting its exclusive jurisdiction: the MOX Plant judgment of the ECJ. Law
Pract Int Courts Tribunals 5:479–493
Linderfalk U (2018) What are the functions of the general principles? Good faith and international
legal pragmatism. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerecht 78:1–32
McLachlan C (2005) The principle of systemic integration and article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna
Convention. Int Comp Law Q 54:279–320
Nolte G (ed) (2013) Treaties and subsequent practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
O’Brien K (2017) Article 300. In: Proelss A (ed) United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea – a commentary. C.H. Beck/Hart/Nomos, München/London/Baden-Baden, pp 1937–1943
Paik J-H (2015) The origin of the principle of natural prolongation: North Sea Continental Shelf
cases revisited. In: del Castillo L (ed) Law of the sea, from Grotius to the International Tribunal
for the Law of the Sea. Liber amicorum Judge Hugo Caminos. Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publisher,
Leiden/Boston pp 583–594
Parlett K (2017) Beyond the four corners of the convention: expanding the scope of jurisdiction of
law of the sea tribunals. Ocean Dev Int Law 48:284–299
139 For a discussion of new forms of creeping jurisdiction, see Virzo (2014).
The ‘General Rule of Interpretation’ in the International Jurisprudence Relating…
the interests of the international community)
139
and, therefore, the new forms of
“sovereigntism”, imperialism and unilateralism that, in recent years, have unfortunately characterized the external relations of an ever-increasing number of States.
References
Ascensio H (2018) Faut-il mettre la pratique dans des catégories? (à propos des travaux de la CDI
sur l’interprétations des traités dans le temps). www.qil-qdi.org, 19–27
Bonafé BI (2017) Maritime delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). Am J Int Law
111:725–731
Caligiuri A (2018) L’arbitrato nella Convenzione delle Nazioni Unite sul diritto del mare. Editoriale
Scientifica, Napoli
Capotorti F (1984) Il diritto dei trattati secondo la Convenzione di Vienna. In: SIOI, Convenzione
di Vienna sul diritto dei trattati. CEDAM, Padova, pp 9–80
Carreau D, Marrella F (2018) Diritto internazionale, 2nd edn. Giuffrè, Milano
Crema L (2017) La prassi successiva e l’interpretazione del diritto internazionale scritto. Giuffrè,
Milano
Del Vecchio A (2013) International courts and tribunals between globalisation and localism.
Eleven International Publishing, The Hague
Distefano G (2011) L’interprétation évolutive de la norme internationale. Revue générale de droit
international public 115:373–396
Dörr O (2018) Article 31. In: Dörr O, Schmalenbach K (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of
Treaties – a commentary. Springer, Berlin, pp 559–616
Gardiner R (2015) Treaty interpretation, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kadelbach S (2018) International Law Commission and role of subsequent practice as a means of
interpretation under articles 31 and 32 VCLT. www.qil-qdi.org, 5–18
Karaman IV (2012) Dispute resolution in the law of the sea. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
Klein N (2005) Dispute settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge
Kojima C (2017) South China Sea arbitration and the protection of the marine environment: evolution of UNCLOS part XII through interpretation and the duty to cooperate. Asian Yearb Int
Law 21:166–180
Kolb R (2000) La bonne foi en droit international public. Presses universitaires de France, Paris
Lavranos N (2006) Protecting its exclusive jurisdiction: the MOX Plant judgment of the ECJ. Law
Pract Int Courts Tribunals 5:479–493
Linderfalk U (2018) What are the functions of the general principles? Good faith and international
legal pragmatism. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerecht 78:1–32
McLachlan C (2005) The principle of systemic integration and article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna
Convention. Int Comp Law Q 54:279–320
Nolte G (ed) (2013) Treaties and subsequent practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
O’Brien K (2017) Article 300. In: Proelss A (ed) United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea – a commentary. C.H. Beck/Hart/Nomos, München/London/Baden-Baden, pp 1937–1943
Paik J-H (2015) The origin of the principle of natural prolongation: North Sea Continental Shelf
cases revisited. In: del Castillo L (ed) Law of the sea, from Grotius to the International Tribunal
for the Law of the Sea. Liber amicorum Judge Hugo Caminos. Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publisher,
Leiden/Boston pp 583–594
Parlett K (2017) Beyond the four corners of the convention: expanding the scope of jurisdiction of
law of the sea tribunals. Ocean Dev Int Law 48:284–299
139 For a discussion of new forms of creeping jurisdiction, see Virzo (2014).
The ‘General Rule of Interpretation’ in the International Jurisprudence Relating…
