380
dispute settlement procedures provided by the Convention, Art. 297 gains increasing attention in judicial and arbitral practice, as many disputes involve the exercise
of sovereign rights. It is through this practice that some important aspects can be
clarified, such as the place of these limitations in the structure of the dispute settlement regime, as well as the impact and possible implications of procedural decisions in the substantive aspects of the dispute.
References
Allen S (2017) Article 297 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the scope
of mandatory jurisdiction. Ocean Dev Int Law 47:313–330
Cannizzaro E (2002) Pouvoirs discrétionnaires des Etats et proportionnalité dans le droit de la mer.
Revue générale de droit international public 106:241–268
Cannone A (2015) L’ordinanza del Tribunale internazionale del diritto del mare sulla vicenda della
Enrica Lexie. Rivista di diritto internazionale 98:1144–1154
Casado Raigón R (2000) Règlement des différends. In: Vignes D et al (eds) Le droit international
de la pêche maritime. Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 316–365
Chapus R (1999) Droit administratif général, 13th edn. LGDJ, Paris
Corten O (1997) L’utilisation du raisonnable par le juge international. Bruylant, Bruxelles
Cot J-P (2007) Les fonctions du raisonnable dans la jurisprudence du Tribunal international
du droit de la mer. In: Droit du pouvoir, pouvoir du droit. Mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon.
Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 271–290
Garcia-Revillo MG (2015) The contentious and advisory jurisdiction of the International Tribunal
for the Law of the Sea. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden
Gautier P (2014) The settlement of disputes. In: Attard D (ed) The IMLI manual of international
maritime law, vol I. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 533–576
Jovanovic S (1988) Restriction des compétences discrétionnaires des Etats en droit international.
Pédone, Paris
Karaman I (2012) Dispute resolution in the law of the sea. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
Kolb R (2017) Good faith in international law. Hart, Oxford
Lauterpacht H (1958) The development of international law by the International Court. Stevens,
London
Nordquist M (1993) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: a commentary, vol 2.
Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht
Noto MC (2016) Arctic Sunrise arbitration and acts of protest at sea. Marit Saf Secur Law J 2:36–56
Orrego Vicuña F (1986) La zone économique exclusive: régime et nature juridique dans le droit
international. Recueil des cours 199:9–170
Oude Elferink A (1999) The impact of article 7(2) of the Fish Stocks Agreement on the Formulation
of Conservation and Management Measures for Straddling Stocks and Highly Migratory
Stocks. http://www.fao.org/3/a-bb037e.pdf
Oxman B (2015) Courts and tribunals: the ICJ, ITLOS, and arbitral tribunals. In: Rothwell D,
Oude Elferink A, Scott K, Stephens T (eds) The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford
University Press, Oxford, pp 394–415
Riphagen W (1983) The settlement of disputes. In: Rozakis C, Stephanou C (eds) The new law of
the sea. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 281–301
Ros N (2017) La gouvernance des mers et des océans, entre mythes et réalités juridiques. Journal
du Droit International 144:757–812
Salmon J (1981) Le concept de raisonnable en droit international public. In: Mélanges offerts à
Paul Reuter. Le droit international: unité et diversité. Pédone, Paris, pp 447–478
E. Scalieri
dispute settlement procedures provided by the Convention, Art. 297 gains increasing attention in judicial and arbitral practice, as many disputes involve the exercise
of sovereign rights. It is through this practice that some important aspects can be
clarified, such as the place of these limitations in the structure of the dispute settlement regime, as well as the impact and possible implications of procedural decisions in the substantive aspects of the dispute.
References
Allen S (2017) Article 297 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the scope
of mandatory jurisdiction. Ocean Dev Int Law 47:313–330
Cannizzaro E (2002) Pouvoirs discrétionnaires des Etats et proportionnalité dans le droit de la mer.
Revue générale de droit international public 106:241–268
Cannone A (2015) L’ordinanza del Tribunale internazionale del diritto del mare sulla vicenda della
Enrica Lexie. Rivista di diritto internazionale 98:1144–1154
Casado Raigón R (2000) Règlement des différends. In: Vignes D et al (eds) Le droit international
de la pêche maritime. Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 316–365
Chapus R (1999) Droit administratif général, 13th edn. LGDJ, Paris
Corten O (1997) L’utilisation du raisonnable par le juge international. Bruylant, Bruxelles
Cot J-P (2007) Les fonctions du raisonnable dans la jurisprudence du Tribunal international
du droit de la mer. In: Droit du pouvoir, pouvoir du droit. Mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon.
Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 271–290
Garcia-Revillo MG (2015) The contentious and advisory jurisdiction of the International Tribunal
for the Law of the Sea. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden
Gautier P (2014) The settlement of disputes. In: Attard D (ed) The IMLI manual of international
maritime law, vol I. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 533–576
Jovanovic S (1988) Restriction des compétences discrétionnaires des Etats en droit international.
Pédone, Paris
Karaman I (2012) Dispute resolution in the law of the sea. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
Kolb R (2017) Good faith in international law. Hart, Oxford
Lauterpacht H (1958) The development of international law by the International Court. Stevens,
London
Nordquist M (1993) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: a commentary, vol 2.
Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht
Noto MC (2016) Arctic Sunrise arbitration and acts of protest at sea. Marit Saf Secur Law J 2:36–56
Orrego Vicuña F (1986) La zone économique exclusive: régime et nature juridique dans le droit
international. Recueil des cours 199:9–170
Oude Elferink A (1999) The impact of article 7(2) of the Fish Stocks Agreement on the Formulation
of Conservation and Management Measures for Straddling Stocks and Highly Migratory
Stocks. http://www.fao.org/3/a-bb037e.pdf
Oxman B (2015) Courts and tribunals: the ICJ, ITLOS, and arbitral tribunals. In: Rothwell D,
Oude Elferink A, Scott K, Stephens T (eds) The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford
University Press, Oxford, pp 394–415
Riphagen W (1983) The settlement of disputes. In: Rozakis C, Stephanou C (eds) The new law of
the sea. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 281–301
Ros N (2017) La gouvernance des mers et des océans, entre mythes et réalités juridiques. Journal
du Droit International 144:757–812
Salmon J (1981) Le concept de raisonnable en droit international public. In: Mélanges offerts à
Paul Reuter. Le droit international: unité et diversité. Pédone, Paris, pp 447–478
E. Scalieri