189
Peiris N (2015) Arctic Sunrise from ITLOS: the Arctic Surprise and in search of a balanced order.
Ocean Yearb 29:44–60
Pemmaraju SR (2016) The South China Sea arbitration (the Philippines v. China): assessment of
the award on jurisdiction and admissibility. Chin J Int Law 14:265–307
Pinto MC (2016) The Philippine claim against China: award on jurisdiction. Korean J Int Comp
Law 4:151–157
Sheng-ti Gau M (2017) The jurisdictional rulings of the South China Sea arbitration: possible
errors in fact and in law. Ocean Yearb 31:197–249
Sofaer A (2016) The Philippine law of the sea action against China: relearning the limits of international adjudication. Chin J Int Law 15:393–402
Talmon S (2016) The South China Sea arbitration: observations on the award on jurisdiction and
admissibility. Chin J Int Law 15:309–391
Talmon S (2017) The South China Sea arbitration and the finality of “Final” awards. J Int Dispute
Settlement 8:388–401
Tanaka Y (2016) Reflections on the Philippines/China arbitration: award on jurisdiction and
admissibility. Law Pract Int Courts Tribunals 15:305–325
Tiantian H (2016) Commentary on award on jurisdiction and admissibility of the Philippinesinstituted arbitration under Annex VII to the UNCLOS: a discussion on fact-finding and evidence. Chin J Glob Gov 2:96–128
Whomersley C (2016) The South China Sea: the award of the tribunal in the case brought by
Philippines against China – a critique. Chin J Int Law 15:239–264
Yee S (2015) The South China Sea arbitration: the clinical isolation and/or one-sided tendencies in
the Philippines’ oral arguments. Chin J Int Law 13:423–435
Yee S (2016) The South China Sea arbitration decisions on jurisdiction and rule of law concerns.
Chin J Int Law 15:219–237
Yu M, Xie Q (2017) Why the award on jurisdiction and admissibility of the South China Sea
arbitration is null and void - taking Article 283 of the UNCLOS as an example. China Oceans
Law Rev 13:34–44
Zhang C, Chang YC (2015) Russian absence at the Arctic Sunrise case: a comparison with the
Chinese position in the South China Sea arbitration. J East Asia Int Law 8:413–426
Zhao J, Li J (2016) The Arctic Sunrise case and its implications for China. In: Wu S, Zou K (eds)
Arbitration concerning the South China Sea: Philippines versus China. Routledge, London.
chapter 7
Zimmermann A, Bäumler J (2013) Navigating through narrow jurisdictional straits: the
Philippines – PRC South China Sea dispute and UNCLOS. Law Pract Int Courts Tribunals
12:431–461
Non-participation in Arbitral Proceedings Under Annex VII United Nations Convention…
Peiris N (2015) Arctic Sunrise from ITLOS: the Arctic Surprise and in search of a balanced order.
Ocean Yearb 29:44–60
Pemmaraju SR (2016) The South China Sea arbitration (the Philippines v. China): assessment of
the award on jurisdiction and admissibility. Chin J Int Law 14:265–307
Pinto MC (2016) The Philippine claim against China: award on jurisdiction. Korean J Int Comp
Law 4:151–157
Sheng-ti Gau M (2017) The jurisdictional rulings of the South China Sea arbitration: possible
errors in fact and in law. Ocean Yearb 31:197–249
Sofaer A (2016) The Philippine law of the sea action against China: relearning the limits of international adjudication. Chin J Int Law 15:393–402
Talmon S (2016) The South China Sea arbitration: observations on the award on jurisdiction and
admissibility. Chin J Int Law 15:309–391
Talmon S (2017) The South China Sea arbitration and the finality of “Final” awards. J Int Dispute
Settlement 8:388–401
Tanaka Y (2016) Reflections on the Philippines/China arbitration: award on jurisdiction and
admissibility. Law Pract Int Courts Tribunals 15:305–325
Tiantian H (2016) Commentary on award on jurisdiction and admissibility of the Philippinesinstituted arbitration under Annex VII to the UNCLOS: a discussion on fact-finding and evidence. Chin J Glob Gov 2:96–128
Whomersley C (2016) The South China Sea: the award of the tribunal in the case brought by
Philippines against China – a critique. Chin J Int Law 15:239–264
Yee S (2015) The South China Sea arbitration: the clinical isolation and/or one-sided tendencies in
the Philippines’ oral arguments. Chin J Int Law 13:423–435
Yee S (2016) The South China Sea arbitration decisions on jurisdiction and rule of law concerns.
Chin J Int Law 15:219–237
Yu M, Xie Q (2017) Why the award on jurisdiction and admissibility of the South China Sea
arbitration is null and void - taking Article 283 of the UNCLOS as an example. China Oceans
Law Rev 13:34–44
Zhang C, Chang YC (2015) Russian absence at the Arctic Sunrise case: a comparison with the
Chinese position in the South China Sea arbitration. J East Asia Int Law 8:413–426
Zhao J, Li J (2016) The Arctic Sunrise case and its implications for China. In: Wu S, Zou K (eds)
Arbitration concerning the South China Sea: Philippines versus China. Routledge, London.
chapter 7
Zimmermann A, Bäumler J (2013) Navigating through narrow jurisdictional straits: the
Philippines – PRC South China Sea dispute and UNCLOS. Law Pract Int Courts Tribunals
12:431–461
Non-participation in Arbitral Proceedings Under Annex VII United Nations Convention…