212
D. Machek et al.
Fujita S, Nakamura K (2018) The shadow of Putit Pla clothes—hourly wage 400 yen, pushed with
delivery [Pura fuku ga kaaeru yami Jikyuu 400 yen, Nouhin Sekasaretuzuke, in Japanese]. Asahi
Shimbun Company, Tokyo
Heinz C (2018) Governing sustainability in the garment sector. The European Union’s action agenda.
IIIEE Thesis 2018:2. IIIEE, Lund University, Lund
Illegal Logging Prohibition Act 2012. No. 166 (Australia)
Illegal Logging Prohibition Regulation 2012. No. 217, 2012 (Australia)
Jastram S, Schneider A (2015) Sustainable fashion governance at the example of the partnership
for sustainable textiles. Umwelt-Wirtschafts Forum 23(4):205–212
Kemikalieinspektionen (2011) Kemikalier i varor. Strategier och styrmedel för att minska riskerna
med farliga ämnen i vardagen [Chemicals in products. Strategies and policy instruments for
reducing the risks with hazardous substances in products, in Swedish]. Rapport Nr 3/11
Kemikalieinspektionen, Sundbyberg
Kogg B (2009) Responsibility in the supply chain: Interorganisational management of environmental
and social aspects in the supply chain—case studies from the textile sector. IIIEE Dissertation,
2. IIIEE, Lund University, Lund
Kogg B, Mont O (2012) Environmental and social responsibility in supply chains: the practise of
choice and inter-organisational management. Ecol Econ 83:154–163
Lacey Act of 2008, 16 USCS § 3371-3378 (USA)
Locke RM (2013) Can global brands create just supply chains? Boston Rev 38(3):12–29
Lund-Thomsen P, Lindgren L (2014) Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: where
are we now and where are we going? J Bus Ethics 123(1):11–22
Machek D (2018) The role of multi-stakeholder initiatives in Swedish apparel brands’ sustainable
supply chain management. Exploring the cases of: Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC), Sweden
Textile Water Initiative (STWI) and Textile Exchange (TE). IIIEE Thesis 2018:23. IIIEE, Lund
University, Lund
Martens J (2007) Multistakeholder partnerships—future models of multilateralism?. FriedrichEbert-Stiftung, Berlin
Mena S, Palazzo G (2012) Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Bus Ethics
Q 22(3):527–556
Nakamura K, Fujita S (2018) 100 million pieces of new clothes per year, including popular brands,
cannot be sold and discarded [Shinpin no fuku, urezu ni haiki “nen 10-oku ten”, ninki brand mo,
in Japnaese]. Asahi Shimbun Company, Tokyo
O’Rourke D (2006) Multi-stakeholder regulation: privatizing or socializing global labor standards?
World Dev 34(5):899–918
Oelze N (2017) Sustainable supply chain management implementation-enablers and barriers in the
textile industry. Sustainability 9(8):1435
Rasche A (2012) Global policies and local practice: loose and tight couplings in multi-stakeholder
initiatives. Bus Ethics Q 22(4):679–708
Regulation (EU) No. 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010
laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market.
OJ L 295, 12.11.2010, pp 23–34
Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006
concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH),
establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing
Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 as well as
Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC
and 2000/21/EC. OJ L 136, 29.5.2007, pp 3–280
Roos S, Zamani B, Sandin G, Peters GM, Svanström M (2016) A life cycle assessment (LCA)-based
approach to guiding an industry sector towards sustainability: the case of the Swedish apparel
sector. J Clean Prod 133:691–700
Rynne B, Corden S (2015) Independent review of the impact of the illegal logging regulations
on small business. [Online] Available www.agriculture.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/for
Précédent

- 212/517

Suivant