32
R. F. Barreiros et al.
• PL_Social-Social Benefits
• PL_Social-Social Benefits-Members Perception
• PL_Social-Social Benefits-Externalities.
The categories identified above, in addition to significant co-occurrences among
themselves, also occur frequently associated with analytical categories related to
cooperative doctrine, mission, balance, economic promotion of members, organizational culture, commitment between cooperative and members, fidelity, production
delivered, cooperative financial surpluses and distribution of financial surpluses.
There are several excerpts that associate social advancement with the economic
evolution of members; as well as the effect of the perception of social benefits by the
members on the strengthening of the cooperative’s organizational culture, and consequently on the commitment between cooperative and members, fidelity, production
delivered and increase of the cooperative’s financial surpluses. Thus, this part of the
analysis considers the relationships between the categories already identified and
more the following ones:
• PE_Cooperative Doctrine
• PE_Mission-Sustainability
• PE_Mission-Balance
• PE_Mission-Social Advancement
• PO_Economic Promotion Members
• PO_Balance Cooperative/Members
• PO_Agro-industrialization
• PO_Market-Price Regulators
• PO_Commitment Cooperative/Members
• PL_Learn-C-Culture
• PL_Learn-C-Culture-New Generations
• PL_Rel.M-Fidelity
• PL_Rel.M-Delivered Production
• PL_Rel.M-Incentives for Cooperation
• PL_Fin-C-Financial Surpluses
• PL_Rel.M-Financial Surpluses Distribution.
The co-occurrences among the considered categories were well distributed in
different contexts, in particular, those relating to different experts when discussing
the theme of social advancement. The distribution of co-occurrences in different
contexts indicates the emergence of particular patterns between the views of respondents, which reinforces the existence of relationships among the considered analytical
categories.
In the opinion of experts, social benefits, in the context of Parana State, lie at the
heart of cooperative societies, which have as one of their principles the sustainable
development of their communities. The social benefits begin with the economic
advancement of the members themselves, with increased income and living levels of
the members and their families. Other indirect benefits are associated with the growth
of cooperatives, such as job creation; the strengthening of regional economies, due
R. F. Barreiros et al.
• PL_Social-Social Benefits
• PL_Social-Social Benefits-Members Perception
• PL_Social-Social Benefits-Externalities.
The categories identified above, in addition to significant co-occurrences among
themselves, also occur frequently associated with analytical categories related to
cooperative doctrine, mission, balance, economic promotion of members, organizational culture, commitment between cooperative and members, fidelity, production
delivered, cooperative financial surpluses and distribution of financial surpluses.
There are several excerpts that associate social advancement with the economic
evolution of members; as well as the effect of the perception of social benefits by the
members on the strengthening of the cooperative’s organizational culture, and consequently on the commitment between cooperative and members, fidelity, production
delivered and increase of the cooperative’s financial surpluses. Thus, this part of the
analysis considers the relationships between the categories already identified and
more the following ones:
• PE_Cooperative Doctrine
• PE_Mission-Sustainability
• PE_Mission-Balance
• PE_Mission-Social Advancement
• PO_Economic Promotion Members
• PO_Balance Cooperative/Members
• PO_Agro-industrialization
• PO_Market-Price Regulators
• PO_Commitment Cooperative/Members
• PL_Learn-C-Culture
• PL_Learn-C-Culture-New Generations
• PL_Rel.M-Fidelity
• PL_Rel.M-Delivered Production
• PL_Rel.M-Incentives for Cooperation
• PL_Fin-C-Financial Surpluses
• PL_Rel.M-Financial Surpluses Distribution.
The co-occurrences among the considered categories were well distributed in
different contexts, in particular, those relating to different experts when discussing
the theme of social advancement. The distribution of co-occurrences in different
contexts indicates the emergence of particular patterns between the views of respondents, which reinforces the existence of relationships among the considered analytical
categories.
In the opinion of experts, social benefits, in the context of Parana State, lie at the
heart of cooperative societies, which have as one of their principles the sustainable
development of their communities. The social benefits begin with the economic
advancement of the members themselves, with increased income and living levels of
the members and their families. Other indirect benefits are associated with the growth
of cooperatives, such as job creation; the strengthening of regional economies, due