Head Model
SAR
1 g
SAR
10 g
Power
(Resolution, Number of
Distance
Phone–Ear
(W/kg)
Deposition
Phone Model
Tissues)
(cm)
(W/kg)
(Percentage)
Reference
900 MHz
Dipole
MRI (2 mm, 10)
1.4
3.36
2.55
41.8
Dimbylow and Mann (1994)
Dipole
MRI (2 mm, 16)
Contact
4.56
3.20
38.8
Bernardi et al. (2000)
Monopole +
box
MRI (2 mm, 10)
1.4
3.62
3.04
38.5
Dimbylow and Mann (1994)
Monopole +
box
MRI (2 mm, 16)
Contact
3.60
2.15
36.5
Bernardi et al. (2000)
1800 MHz
Dipole
MRI (2 mm, 10)
1.4
6.20
4.26
30.9
Dimbylow and Mann (1994)
Dipole
MRI (1.97 ×
1.97 ×
3 mm, 15)
1.38
4.40–6.50 a
46.4
Gandhi, Lazzi, and Furse (1996)
Monopole +
box
MRI (2 mm, 10)
1.4
5.63
3.84
38.5
Dimbylow and Mann (1994)
Monopole +
box
MRI (1.97×1.97×3 mm, 15)
1.38
4.24–6.96 a
45.4
Gandhi, Lazzi, and Furse (1996)
a
Diff erent volumes of averaging tissue mass.
32
TaBlE 1.6 Computed SAR in Anatomical Models Exposed to Cellular Telephones (Normalized to 1.0-W Radiated Power)
Electromagnetic Fields in Biological Systems
SAR
1 g
SAR
10 g
Power
(Resolution, Number of
Distance
Phone–Ear
(W/kg)
Deposition
Phone Model
Tissues)
(cm)
(W/kg)
(Percentage)
Reference
900 MHz
Dipole
MRI (2 mm, 10)
1.4
3.36
2.55
41.8
Dimbylow and Mann (1994)
Dipole
MRI (2 mm, 16)
Contact
4.56
3.20
38.8
Bernardi et al. (2000)
Monopole +
box
MRI (2 mm, 10)
1.4
3.62
3.04
38.5
Dimbylow and Mann (1994)
Monopole +
box
MRI (2 mm, 16)
Contact
3.60
2.15
36.5
Bernardi et al. (2000)
1800 MHz
Dipole
MRI (2 mm, 10)
1.4
6.20
4.26
30.9
Dimbylow and Mann (1994)
Dipole
MRI (1.97 ×
1.97 ×
3 mm, 15)
1.38
4.40–6.50 a
46.4
Gandhi, Lazzi, and Furse (1996)
Monopole +
box
MRI (2 mm, 10)
1.4
5.63
3.84
38.5
Dimbylow and Mann (1994)
Monopole +
box
MRI (1.97×1.97×3 mm, 15)
1.38
4.24–6.96 a
45.4
Gandhi, Lazzi, and Furse (1996)
a
Diff erent volumes of averaging tissue mass.
32
TaBlE 1.6 Computed SAR in Anatomical Models Exposed to Cellular Telephones (Normalized to 1.0-W Radiated Power)
Electromagnetic Fields in Biological Systems
