68. Flipo N, Monteil C, Poulin M et al (2012) Hybrid fitting of a hydrosystem model: long term
insight into the Beauce aquifer functioning (France). Water Resour Res 48:W05509. https://
doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011092
69. Baratelli F, Flipo N, Moatar F (2016) Estimation of distributed stream-aquifer exchanges at the
regional scale using a distributed model: sensitivity to in-stream water level fluctuations,
riverbed elevation and roughness. J Hydrol 542:686–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.
2016.09.041
70. Labarthe B, Pryet A, Saleh F et al (2015) Distributed simulation of daily stream-aquifer
exchanged fluxes in the Seine River basin at regional scale. In: Lollino G, Arrattano M,
Rinaldi M et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, pp
261–265
71. Vergnes J-P, Habets F (2018) Impact of river water levels on the simulation of stream–aquifer
exchanges over the Upper Rhine alluvial aquifer (France/Germany). Hydrgeol J
26:2443–2457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1788-0
72. Flipo N, Mouhri A, Labarthe B et al (2014) Continental hydrosystem modelling: the concept
of nested stream-aquifer interfaces. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:3121–3149. https://doi.org/10.
5194/hess-18-3121-2014
73. Tóth J (1963) A theoretical analysis of groundwater flow in small drainage basins. J Geophys
Res 68:4795–4812
74. Girard G, Ledoux E, Villeneuve J-P (1980) An integrated rainfall, surface and underground
runoff model. La Houille Blanche 4/5:315–320
75. Deschesnes J, Villeneuve J-P, Ledoux E, Girard G (1985) Modeling the hydrologic cycle: the
MC model. Part I – principles and description. Hydrol Res 16:257–272
76. Nash JE (1959) Systematic determination of unit hydrograph parameters. J Geophys Res
64:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ064i001p00111
77. Besbes M, De Marsily G (1984) From infiltration to recharge: use of a parametric transfer
function. J Hydrol 74:271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(84)90019-2
78. de Marsily G (1986) Quantitative hydrogeology – groundwater hydrology for engineers.
Academic Press, London
79. Rushton K (2007) Representation in regional models of saturated river-aquifer interaction for
gaining/losing rivers. J Hydrol 334:262–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.008
80. Ebel BA, Mirus BB, Heppner CS et al (2009) First-order exchange coefficient coupling for
simulating surface water-groundwater interactions: parameter sensitivity and consistency with
a physics-based approach. Hydrol Process 23:1949–1959. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7279
81. David CH, Habets F, Maidment DR, Yang Z-L (2011) RAPID applied to the SIM-France
model. Hydrol Process 25:3412–3425. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8070
82. David CH, Yang Z-L, Famiglietti JS (2013) Quantification of the upstream-to-downstream
influence in the Muskingum method and implications for speedup in parallel computations of
river flow. Water Resour Res 49:2783–2800
83. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Geophys Union Trans
38:913–920
84. de Fouquet C (2012) Environmental statistics revisited: is the mean reliable? Environ Sci
Technol 46:1964–1970
85. Quintana-Seguí P, Le MP, Durand Y et al (2008) Analysis of near-surface atmospheric
variables: validation of the SAFRAN analysis over France. J Appl Meteorol Climatol
47:92–107
86. Vidal J-P, Martin E, Franchistéguy L et al (2010) A 50-year high-resolution atmospheric
reanalysis over France with the Safran system. Int J Climatol 30:1627–1644. https://doi.org/
10.1002/joc.2003
87. Wu B, Zheng Y, Tian Y et al (2014) Systematic assessment of the uncertainty in integrated
surface water-groundwater modeling based on the probabilistic collocation method. Water
Resour Res 50:5848–5865. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015366
Pluri-annual Water Budget on the Seine Basin: Past, Current and Future Trends
87
insight into the Beauce aquifer functioning (France). Water Resour Res 48:W05509. https://
doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011092
69. Baratelli F, Flipo N, Moatar F (2016) Estimation of distributed stream-aquifer exchanges at the
regional scale using a distributed model: sensitivity to in-stream water level fluctuations,
riverbed elevation and roughness. J Hydrol 542:686–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.
2016.09.041
70. Labarthe B, Pryet A, Saleh F et al (2015) Distributed simulation of daily stream-aquifer
exchanged fluxes in the Seine River basin at regional scale. In: Lollino G, Arrattano M,
Rinaldi M et al (eds) Engineering geology for society and territory, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, pp
261–265
71. Vergnes J-P, Habets F (2018) Impact of river water levels on the simulation of stream–aquifer
exchanges over the Upper Rhine alluvial aquifer (France/Germany). Hydrgeol J
26:2443–2457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1788-0
72. Flipo N, Mouhri A, Labarthe B et al (2014) Continental hydrosystem modelling: the concept
of nested stream-aquifer interfaces. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:3121–3149. https://doi.org/10.
5194/hess-18-3121-2014
73. Tóth J (1963) A theoretical analysis of groundwater flow in small drainage basins. J Geophys
Res 68:4795–4812
74. Girard G, Ledoux E, Villeneuve J-P (1980) An integrated rainfall, surface and underground
runoff model. La Houille Blanche 4/5:315–320
75. Deschesnes J, Villeneuve J-P, Ledoux E, Girard G (1985) Modeling the hydrologic cycle: the
MC model. Part I – principles and description. Hydrol Res 16:257–272
76. Nash JE (1959) Systematic determination of unit hydrograph parameters. J Geophys Res
64:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ064i001p00111
77. Besbes M, De Marsily G (1984) From infiltration to recharge: use of a parametric transfer
function. J Hydrol 74:271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(84)90019-2
78. de Marsily G (1986) Quantitative hydrogeology – groundwater hydrology for engineers.
Academic Press, London
79. Rushton K (2007) Representation in regional models of saturated river-aquifer interaction for
gaining/losing rivers. J Hydrol 334:262–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.008
80. Ebel BA, Mirus BB, Heppner CS et al (2009) First-order exchange coefficient coupling for
simulating surface water-groundwater interactions: parameter sensitivity and consistency with
a physics-based approach. Hydrol Process 23:1949–1959. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7279
81. David CH, Habets F, Maidment DR, Yang Z-L (2011) RAPID applied to the SIM-France
model. Hydrol Process 25:3412–3425. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8070
82. David CH, Yang Z-L, Famiglietti JS (2013) Quantification of the upstream-to-downstream
influence in the Muskingum method and implications for speedup in parallel computations of
river flow. Water Resour Res 49:2783–2800
83. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Geophys Union Trans
38:913–920
84. de Fouquet C (2012) Environmental statistics revisited: is the mean reliable? Environ Sci
Technol 46:1964–1970
85. Quintana-Seguí P, Le MP, Durand Y et al (2008) Analysis of near-surface atmospheric
variables: validation of the SAFRAN analysis over France. J Appl Meteorol Climatol
47:92–107
86. Vidal J-P, Martin E, Franchistéguy L et al (2010) A 50-year high-resolution atmospheric
reanalysis over France with the Safran system. Int J Climatol 30:1627–1644. https://doi.org/
10.1002/joc.2003
87. Wu B, Zheng Y, Tian Y et al (2014) Systematic assessment of the uncertainty in integrated
surface water-groundwater modeling based on the probabilistic collocation method. Water
Resour Res 50:5848–5865. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015366
Pluri-annual Water Budget on the Seine Basin: Past, Current and Future Trends
87