1 3
Topics in Current Chemistry (2019) 377:22
95. Ramos B, Ookawara S, Matsushita Y, Yoshikawa S (2015) Intensification of solar photocatalysis
with immobilized TiO 2 by using micro-structured reaction spaces. J Environ Chem Eng 3:681–688
96. Claes T, Dilissen A, Leblebici ME, Van Gerven T (2019) Translucent packed bed structures for
high throughput photocatalytic reactors. Chem Eng J 361:725–735
97. Imoberdorf GE, Vella G, Sclafani A, Rizzuti L, Alfano OM, Cassano AE (2010) Radiation model
of a TiO 2 -coated, quartz wool, packed-bed photocatalytic reactor. AIChE J 56(4):1030–1044
98. Vella G, Imoberdorf GE, Sclafani A, Cassano AE, Alfano OM, Rizzuti L (2010) Modeling of a
TiO 2 -coated quartz wool packed bed photocatalytic reactor. Appl Catal B Environ 96:399–407
99. Changrani RG, Raupp GB (1999) Monte Carlo simulation of the radiation field in a reticulated
foam photocatalytic reactor. AIChE J 45:1085–1094
100. Changrani RG, Raupp GB (2000) Two-dimensional heterogeneous model for a reticulated foam
photocatalytic reactor. AIChE J 46:829–842
101. Kouamé AN, Masson R, Robert D, Keller N, Keller V (2013) β-SiC foams as a promising structured photocatalytic support for water and air detoxification. Catal Today 209:13–20
102. Alexiadis A, Baldi G, Mazzarino I (2001) Modelling of a photocatalytic reactor with a fixed bed of
supported catalyst. Catal Today 66:467–474
103. Sampaio MJ, Silva CG, Silva AMT, Vilar VJP, Boaventura RAR, Faria JL (2013) Photocatalytic
activity of TiO 2 -coated glass raschig rings on the degradation of phenolic derivatives under simulated solar light irradiation. Chem Eng J 224:32–38
104. Cloteaux A, Gérardin F, Thomas D, Midoux N, André J-C (2014) Fixed bed photocatalytic reactor
for formaldehyde degradation: experimental and modeling study. Chem Eng J 249:121–129
105. Manassero A, Satuf ML, Alfano OM (2017) Photocatalytic degradation of an emerging pollutant
by TiO 2 -coated glass rings: a kinetic study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:6031–6039
106. Cerdá J, Marchetti JL, Cassano AE (1977) Radiation efficiencies in elliptical photoreactors. Lat
Am J Heat Mass Transf 1:33–63
107. Passalía C, Alfano OM, Brandi RJ (2013) Optimal design of a corrugated-wall photocatalytic reactor using efficiencies in series and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. Ind Eng Chem
Res 52:6916–6922
108. Imoberdorf GE, Cassano AE, Irazoqui HA, Alfano OM (2007) Simulation of a multi-annular
photocatalytic reactor for degradation of perchloroethylene in air: parametric analysis of radiative
energy efficiencies. Chem Eng Sci 64:1138–1154
109. Motegh M, Cen J, Appel PW, van Ommen JR, Kreutzer M (2012) Photocatalytic-reactor efficiencies and simplified expressions to assess their relevance in kinetic experiments. Chem Eng J
207–208:607–615
110. Bolton JR, Bircher KG, Tumas W, Tolman CA (2001) Figures-of-merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric- and solar-driven systems (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 73(4):627–637
111. Serrano B, de Lasa H (1997) Photocatalytic degradation of water organic pollutants. Kinetic modeling and energy efficiency. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:4705–4711
112. de Lasa H, Serrano B, Moreira J, Valades-Pelayo P (2016) Efficiency factors in photocatalytic
reactors: quantum yield and photochemical thermodynamic efficiency factor. Chem Eng Technol
39:51–65
113. Li D, Xiong K, Li W, Yang Z, Liu C, Feng X, Lu X (2010) Comparative study in liquid phase heterogeneous photocatalysis: model for photoreactor scale-up. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:8397–8405
114. Leblebici ME, Stefanidis GD, Van Gerven T (2015) Comparison of photocatalytic space-time
yields of 12 reactor designs for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng Process 97:106–111
115. Brandi RJ, Citroni MA, Alfano OM, Cassano AE (2003) Absolute quantum yields in photocatalytic slurry reactors. Chem Eng Sci 58:979–985
116. Manassero A, Satuf ML, Alfano OM (2013) Evaluation of UV and visible light activity of TiO 2
catalysts for water remediation. Chem Eng J 225:378–386
117. Ryu J, Choi W (2008) Substrate-specific photocatalytic activities of TiO 2 and multiactivity test for
water treatment application. Environ Sci Technol 42:294–300
118. Manassero A, Satuf ML, Alfano OM (2017) Photocatalytic reactors with suspended and immobilized TiO 2 : comparative efficiency evaluation. Chem Eng J 326:29–36
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations.
301
Reprinted from the journal
Topics in Current Chemistry (2019) 377:22
95. Ramos B, Ookawara S, Matsushita Y, Yoshikawa S (2015) Intensification of solar photocatalysis
with immobilized TiO 2 by using micro-structured reaction spaces. J Environ Chem Eng 3:681–688
96. Claes T, Dilissen A, Leblebici ME, Van Gerven T (2019) Translucent packed bed structures for
high throughput photocatalytic reactors. Chem Eng J 361:725–735
97. Imoberdorf GE, Vella G, Sclafani A, Rizzuti L, Alfano OM, Cassano AE (2010) Radiation model
of a TiO 2 -coated, quartz wool, packed-bed photocatalytic reactor. AIChE J 56(4):1030–1044
98. Vella G, Imoberdorf GE, Sclafani A, Cassano AE, Alfano OM, Rizzuti L (2010) Modeling of a
TiO 2 -coated quartz wool packed bed photocatalytic reactor. Appl Catal B Environ 96:399–407
99. Changrani RG, Raupp GB (1999) Monte Carlo simulation of the radiation field in a reticulated
foam photocatalytic reactor. AIChE J 45:1085–1094
100. Changrani RG, Raupp GB (2000) Two-dimensional heterogeneous model for a reticulated foam
photocatalytic reactor. AIChE J 46:829–842
101. Kouamé AN, Masson R, Robert D, Keller N, Keller V (2013) β-SiC foams as a promising structured photocatalytic support for water and air detoxification. Catal Today 209:13–20
102. Alexiadis A, Baldi G, Mazzarino I (2001) Modelling of a photocatalytic reactor with a fixed bed of
supported catalyst. Catal Today 66:467–474
103. Sampaio MJ, Silva CG, Silva AMT, Vilar VJP, Boaventura RAR, Faria JL (2013) Photocatalytic
activity of TiO 2 -coated glass raschig rings on the degradation of phenolic derivatives under simulated solar light irradiation. Chem Eng J 224:32–38
104. Cloteaux A, Gérardin F, Thomas D, Midoux N, André J-C (2014) Fixed bed photocatalytic reactor
for formaldehyde degradation: experimental and modeling study. Chem Eng J 249:121–129
105. Manassero A, Satuf ML, Alfano OM (2017) Photocatalytic degradation of an emerging pollutant
by TiO 2 -coated glass rings: a kinetic study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:6031–6039
106. Cerdá J, Marchetti JL, Cassano AE (1977) Radiation efficiencies in elliptical photoreactors. Lat
Am J Heat Mass Transf 1:33–63
107. Passalía C, Alfano OM, Brandi RJ (2013) Optimal design of a corrugated-wall photocatalytic reactor using efficiencies in series and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. Ind Eng Chem
Res 52:6916–6922
108. Imoberdorf GE, Cassano AE, Irazoqui HA, Alfano OM (2007) Simulation of a multi-annular
photocatalytic reactor for degradation of perchloroethylene in air: parametric analysis of radiative
energy efficiencies. Chem Eng Sci 64:1138–1154
109. Motegh M, Cen J, Appel PW, van Ommen JR, Kreutzer M (2012) Photocatalytic-reactor efficiencies and simplified expressions to assess their relevance in kinetic experiments. Chem Eng J
207–208:607–615
110. Bolton JR, Bircher KG, Tumas W, Tolman CA (2001) Figures-of-merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric- and solar-driven systems (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 73(4):627–637
111. Serrano B, de Lasa H (1997) Photocatalytic degradation of water organic pollutants. Kinetic modeling and energy efficiency. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:4705–4711
112. de Lasa H, Serrano B, Moreira J, Valades-Pelayo P (2016) Efficiency factors in photocatalytic
reactors: quantum yield and photochemical thermodynamic efficiency factor. Chem Eng Technol
39:51–65
113. Li D, Xiong K, Li W, Yang Z, Liu C, Feng X, Lu X (2010) Comparative study in liquid phase heterogeneous photocatalysis: model for photoreactor scale-up. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:8397–8405
114. Leblebici ME, Stefanidis GD, Van Gerven T (2015) Comparison of photocatalytic space-time
yields of 12 reactor designs for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng Process 97:106–111
115. Brandi RJ, Citroni MA, Alfano OM, Cassano AE (2003) Absolute quantum yields in photocatalytic slurry reactors. Chem Eng Sci 58:979–985
116. Manassero A, Satuf ML, Alfano OM (2013) Evaluation of UV and visible light activity of TiO 2
catalysts for water remediation. Chem Eng J 225:378–386
117. Ryu J, Choi W (2008) Substrate-specific photocatalytic activities of TiO 2 and multiactivity test for
water treatment application. Environ Sci Technol 42:294–300
118. Manassero A, Satuf ML, Alfano OM (2017) Photocatalytic reactors with suspended and immobilized TiO 2 : comparative efficiency evaluation. Chem Eng J 326:29–36
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations.
301
Reprinted from the journal
Précédent