Topics in Current Chemistry (2020) 378:6
1 3
Table 5
(continued)
Catalyst
Bandgap (eV) Co-catalyst Sacrificial agent
Light source
H
2 evolution rate
(mmol h
−1
 g
−1
cat )
Apparent quantum
yield (%)
References
CaFe
2 O
4
1.83
Pt
Methanol
Hg arc lamp
λ
= 420 ± 10 nm
1.09
1.57
(λ = 420 ± 10 nm)
Dom et al. [155]
SrFe
2 O
4
1.77
–
Methanol
250 W Hg lamp
0.730
–
Jiménez-Miramontes
et al. [156]
LaFeO
3
2.11
–
Methanol
125 W Hg lamp
λ
≥ 420 nm
8.6
8.07 (λ
≥ 420 nm)
Parida et al. [83]
LaFeO
3
2.07
Pt
Ethanol
2 × 200 W tungsten
lamp
3.315
–
Tijare et al. [157]
LaFeO
3
2.0
–
Glucose
10 W LED 440 nm
0.292
–
Iervolino et al. [158]
Ru-doped LaFeO
3
1.98
–
Waste water from
brewing
10 W LED 460 nm
0.532
–
Iervolino et al. [199]
LaFeO
3
2.22
Pt
Triethanolamine
300 W Xe lamp
λ
≥ 420 nm
0.707
–
Chen et al. [159]
La
0.925 Sr
0.075 Fe
0.925 Ti
0.075 O
3
2.1
Pt
Methanol
300 W Xe lamp
λ
≥ 420 nm
0.555
–
Hojamberdiev et al.
[160]
LaSrFeO
4
2.16
Pt
Na
2 SO
3
500 W Hg lamp
λ
≥ 400 nm
0.158
0.19 (λ ≥ 420 nm)
Chen et al. [200]
134
Reprinted from the journal