1 3
Topics in Current Chemistry (2020) 378:29
photocatalytic oxidation and tailored operation can indeed yield synergism, leading
to much more effective treatment in a cost-effective manner.
References
1. Wang J, Zhuan R (2020) Degradation of antibiotics by advanced oxidation processes: an overview.
Sci Total Environ 701:135023
2. Mohapatra DP, Kirpalani DM (2019) Advancement in treatment of wastewater: fate of emerging
contaminants. Can J Chem Eng 97(10):2621–2631
3. Akerdi AG, Bahrami SH (2019) Application of heterogeneous nano-semiconductors for photocatalytic advanced oxidation of organic compounds: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 7(5):103283
4. Aiyer SSC, Ramachandran S, Thiruma Valavan K, Prakash Kumar BG (2015) A review of solar
photocatalytic degradation of wastewater using advanced oxidation processes. J Ind Pollut Control
31(2):297–309
5. Ballari MM, Satuf ML, Alfano OM (2019) Photocatalytic reactor modeling: application to
advanced oxidation processes for chemical pollution abatement. Top Curr Chem 377(5):22
6. Bhangu SK, Ashokkumar M (2016) Theory of sonochemistry. Top Curr Chem 374(4):56
7. Pokhrel N, Vabbina PK, Pala N (2016) Sonochemistry: science and engineering. Ultrason Sonochem 29:104–128
8. Chatel G (2019) Sonochemistry in nanocatalysis: the use of ultrasound from the catalyst synthesis
to the catalytic reaction. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 15:1–6
9. Adewuyi YG (2005) Sonochemistry in environmental remediation. 2. Heterogeneous sonophotocatalytic oxidation processes for the treatment of pollutants in water. Environ Sci Technol
39(22):8557–8570
10. Wood RJ, Lee J, Bussemaker MJ (2017) A parametric review of sonochemistry: control and augmentation of sonochemical activity in aqueous solutions. Ultrason Sonochem 38:351–370
11. Gogate PR, Sutkar VS, Pandit AB (2011) Sonochemical reactors: important design and scale up
considerations with a special emphasis on heterogeneous systems. Chem Eng J 166(3):1066–1082
12. Sutkar VS, Gogate PR (2009) Design aspects of sonochemical reactors: techniques for understanding cavitational activity distribution and effect of operating parameters. Chem Eng J
155(1–2):26–36
13. Pang YL, Abdullah AZ, Bhatia S (2011) Review on sonochemical methods in the presence of
catalysts and chemical additives for treatment of organic pollutants in wastewater. Desalination
277(1–3):1–14
14. Dalodière E, Virot M, Moisy P, Nikitenko SI (2016) Effect of ultrasonic frequency on H 2 O 2 sonochemical formation rate in aqueous nitric acid solutions in the presence of oxygen. Ultrason Sonochem 29:198–204
15. Gogate PR, Shaha S, Csoka L (2015) Intensification of cavitational activity using gases in different
types of sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng J 262:1033–1042
16. Anandan S, Ashokkumar M (2010) Sonochemical preparation of monometallic, bimetallic and
metal-loaded semiconductor nanoparticles. In: Pankaj, Muthupandian A (eds) Theoretical and
experimental sonochemistry involving inorganic systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 151–169
17. Bagheri S, Mohd Hir ZA, Yousefi AT, Abdul Hamid SB (2015) Progress on mesoporous titanium
dioxide: synthesis, modification and applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 218:206–222
18. Antonelli DM (1999) Synthesis of phosphorus-free mesoporous titania via templating with amine
surfactants. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 30:315–319
19. Alapi T, Sipos P, Ilisz I, Wittmann G, Ambrus Z, Kiricsi I, Mogyorósi K, Dombi A (2006) Synthesis and characterization of titania photocatalysts: the influence of pretreatment on the activity. Appl
Catal A Gen 303:1–8
20. Yu JC, Zhang L, Yu J (2002) Rapid synthesis of mesoporous TiO 2 with high photocatalytic activity
by ultrasound-induced agglomeration. New J Chem 26:416–420
21. Ho W, Yu JC (2006) Sonochemical synthesis and visible light photocatalytic behavior of CdSe and
CdSe/TiO 2 nanoparticles. J Mol Catal A Chem 247:268–274
22. Colmenares JC, Kuna E, Lisowski P (2016) Synthesis of photoactive materials by sonication:
application in photocatalysis and solar cells. Top Curr Chem 374:59
101
Reprinted from the journal
Topics in Current Chemistry (2020) 378:29
photocatalytic oxidation and tailored operation can indeed yield synergism, leading
to much more effective treatment in a cost-effective manner.
References
1. Wang J, Zhuan R (2020) Degradation of antibiotics by advanced oxidation processes: an overview.
Sci Total Environ 701:135023
2. Mohapatra DP, Kirpalani DM (2019) Advancement in treatment of wastewater: fate of emerging
contaminants. Can J Chem Eng 97(10):2621–2631
3. Akerdi AG, Bahrami SH (2019) Application of heterogeneous nano-semiconductors for photocatalytic advanced oxidation of organic compounds: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 7(5):103283
4. Aiyer SSC, Ramachandran S, Thiruma Valavan K, Prakash Kumar BG (2015) A review of solar
photocatalytic degradation of wastewater using advanced oxidation processes. J Ind Pollut Control
31(2):297–309
5. Ballari MM, Satuf ML, Alfano OM (2019) Photocatalytic reactor modeling: application to
advanced oxidation processes for chemical pollution abatement. Top Curr Chem 377(5):22
6. Bhangu SK, Ashokkumar M (2016) Theory of sonochemistry. Top Curr Chem 374(4):56
7. Pokhrel N, Vabbina PK, Pala N (2016) Sonochemistry: science and engineering. Ultrason Sonochem 29:104–128
8. Chatel G (2019) Sonochemistry in nanocatalysis: the use of ultrasound from the catalyst synthesis
to the catalytic reaction. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 15:1–6
9. Adewuyi YG (2005) Sonochemistry in environmental remediation. 2. Heterogeneous sonophotocatalytic oxidation processes for the treatment of pollutants in water. Environ Sci Technol
39(22):8557–8570
10. Wood RJ, Lee J, Bussemaker MJ (2017) A parametric review of sonochemistry: control and augmentation of sonochemical activity in aqueous solutions. Ultrason Sonochem 38:351–370
11. Gogate PR, Sutkar VS, Pandit AB (2011) Sonochemical reactors: important design and scale up
considerations with a special emphasis on heterogeneous systems. Chem Eng J 166(3):1066–1082
12. Sutkar VS, Gogate PR (2009) Design aspects of sonochemical reactors: techniques for understanding cavitational activity distribution and effect of operating parameters. Chem Eng J
155(1–2):26–36
13. Pang YL, Abdullah AZ, Bhatia S (2011) Review on sonochemical methods in the presence of
catalysts and chemical additives for treatment of organic pollutants in wastewater. Desalination
277(1–3):1–14
14. Dalodière E, Virot M, Moisy P, Nikitenko SI (2016) Effect of ultrasonic frequency on H 2 O 2 sonochemical formation rate in aqueous nitric acid solutions in the presence of oxygen. Ultrason Sonochem 29:198–204
15. Gogate PR, Shaha S, Csoka L (2015) Intensification of cavitational activity using gases in different
types of sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng J 262:1033–1042
16. Anandan S, Ashokkumar M (2010) Sonochemical preparation of monometallic, bimetallic and
metal-loaded semiconductor nanoparticles. In: Pankaj, Muthupandian A (eds) Theoretical and
experimental sonochemistry involving inorganic systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 151–169
17. Bagheri S, Mohd Hir ZA, Yousefi AT, Abdul Hamid SB (2015) Progress on mesoporous titanium
dioxide: synthesis, modification and applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 218:206–222
18. Antonelli DM (1999) Synthesis of phosphorus-free mesoporous titania via templating with amine
surfactants. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 30:315–319
19. Alapi T, Sipos P, Ilisz I, Wittmann G, Ambrus Z, Kiricsi I, Mogyorósi K, Dombi A (2006) Synthesis and characterization of titania photocatalysts: the influence of pretreatment on the activity. Appl
Catal A Gen 303:1–8
20. Yu JC, Zhang L, Yu J (2002) Rapid synthesis of mesoporous TiO 2 with high photocatalytic activity
by ultrasound-induced agglomeration. New J Chem 26:416–420
21. Ho W, Yu JC (2006) Sonochemical synthesis and visible light photocatalytic behavior of CdSe and
CdSe/TiO 2 nanoparticles. J Mol Catal A Chem 247:268–274
22. Colmenares JC, Kuna E, Lisowski P (2016) Synthesis of photoactive materials by sonication:
application in photocatalysis and solar cells. Top Curr Chem 374:59
101
Reprinted from the journal