Topics in Current Chemistry (2018) 376:42
1 3
119. Abdel Hameed RM, Medany SS (2017) NiO nanoparticles on graphene nanosheets at different
calcination temperatures as effective electrocatalysts for urea electro-oxidation in alkaline medium.
J Colloid Interface Sci 508:291–302. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.048
120. Glass DE, Galvan V, Prakash GKS (2017) The effect of annealing temperature on nickel on
reduced graphene oxide catalysts on urea electrooxidation. Electrochim Acta 253:489–497. https ://
doi.org/10.1016/j.elect acta.2017.09.064
121. Wang D, Yan W, Vijapur SH, Botte GG (2013) Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide–nickel
nanocomposites for urea electrolysis. Electrochim Acta 89:732–736. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.elect
acta.2012.11.046
122. Bian L, Du T, Du Q, Luo M, Li M (2017) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes twined α-nickel hydroxide microspheres as high-efficient urea electrooxidation catalysts. J Appl Electrochem 47(8):905–
915. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1080 0-017-1087-9
123. Barakat NAM, Motlak M, Ghouri ZK, Yasin AS, El-Newehy MH, Al-Deyab SS (2016) Nickel
nanoparticles-decorated graphene as highly effective and stable electrocatalyst for urea electrooxidation. J Mol Catal A: Chem 421:83–91. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.molca ta.2016.05.011
124. Wang L, Du T, Cheng J, Xie X, Yang B, Li M (2015) Enhanced activity of urea electrooxidation on
nickel catalysts supported on tungsten carbides/carbon nanotubes. J Power Sources 280:550–554.
https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpows our.2015.01.141
125. Kakati N, Maiti J, Lee KS, Viswanathan B, Yoon YS (2017) Hollow sodium nickel fluoride nanocubes deposited MWCNT as an efficient electrocatalyst for urea oxidation. Electrochim Acta
240:175–185. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.elect acta.2017.04.055
126. Ye K, Zhang D, Guo F, Cheng K, Wang G, Cao D (2015) Highly porous nickel@carbon sponge as
a novel type of three-dimensional anode with low cost for high catalytic performance of urea electro-oxidation in alkaline medium. J Power Sources 283:408–415. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpows
our.2015.02.149
Reprinted from the journal
78
1 3
119. Abdel Hameed RM, Medany SS (2017) NiO nanoparticles on graphene nanosheets at different
calcination temperatures as effective electrocatalysts for urea electro-oxidation in alkaline medium.
J Colloid Interface Sci 508:291–302. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.048
120. Glass DE, Galvan V, Prakash GKS (2017) The effect of annealing temperature on nickel on
reduced graphene oxide catalysts on urea electrooxidation. Electrochim Acta 253:489–497. https ://
doi.org/10.1016/j.elect acta.2017.09.064
121. Wang D, Yan W, Vijapur SH, Botte GG (2013) Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide–nickel
nanocomposites for urea electrolysis. Electrochim Acta 89:732–736. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.elect
acta.2012.11.046
122. Bian L, Du T, Du Q, Luo M, Li M (2017) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes twined α-nickel hydroxide microspheres as high-efficient urea electrooxidation catalysts. J Appl Electrochem 47(8):905–
915. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1080 0-017-1087-9
123. Barakat NAM, Motlak M, Ghouri ZK, Yasin AS, El-Newehy MH, Al-Deyab SS (2016) Nickel
nanoparticles-decorated graphene as highly effective and stable electrocatalyst for urea electrooxidation. J Mol Catal A: Chem 421:83–91. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.molca ta.2016.05.011
124. Wang L, Du T, Cheng J, Xie X, Yang B, Li M (2015) Enhanced activity of urea electrooxidation on
nickel catalysts supported on tungsten carbides/carbon nanotubes. J Power Sources 280:550–554.
https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpows our.2015.01.141
125. Kakati N, Maiti J, Lee KS, Viswanathan B, Yoon YS (2017) Hollow sodium nickel fluoride nanocubes deposited MWCNT as an efficient electrocatalyst for urea oxidation. Electrochim Acta
240:175–185. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.elect acta.2017.04.055
126. Ye K, Zhang D, Guo F, Cheng K, Wang G, Cao D (2015) Highly porous nickel@carbon sponge as
a novel type of three-dimensional anode with low cost for high catalytic performance of urea electro-oxidation in alkaline medium. J Power Sources 283:408–415. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpows
our.2015.02.149
Reprinted from the journal
78