0
200
400
600
800
s
s
e
n
h
c
i
r
t
n
a
i
r
a
v
e
c
n
e
u
q
e
s
n
o
c
i
l
p
m
A
a
A
A
A
B
b
c
a
type x process F = 22.31, P < 0.0001
3,16
a)
10
20
30
y
t
i
s
r
e
v
i
d
c
i
t
e
n
e
g
o
l
y
h
p
h
t
i
a
F
t
s
o
p
m
o
c
i
m
r
r
e
V
c
r
a
m
e
p
a
r
G
a
i
c
a
c
A
m
o
o
r
b
h
c
t
o
c
S
t
s
o
p
m
o
c
i
m
r
r
e
V
t
s
o
p
m
o
c
i
m
r
e
V
t
s
o
p
m
o
c
i
m
r
e
V
c
r
a
m
d
e
l
l
i
t
s
i
D
b)
a
b
ab
c
A
A
B
B
type x process F
=
= 40.36, P < 0.0001
3,16
Fig. 8.3 Changes in bacterial α-diversity estimated as (a) observed ASV richness and (b) Faith
phylogenetic diversity of the fresh plant materials (Scotch broom, acacia, raw and distilled grape
marcs) and the respective vermicomposts. All of the four plant materials were significantly different
from their respective vermicomposts (P < 0.05). Different lowercase and capital letters over the
boxplots indicate significant differences among fresh plant materials and vermicomposts, respectively (Tukey HSD test, FDR corrected)
8 Vermicomposts Are Biologically Different: Microbial and Functional Diversity of. . .
133