Data Reduction
11
Table 1.2 90% confidence bounds
on the Weibull line [1.1]
Sample size (n)
K(n)
3
0.540
4
0.420
5
0.380
6
0.338
7
0.307
8
0.284
9
0.269
10
0.246
11
0.237
12
0.222
13
0.213
14
0.204
15
0.197
20
0.169
25
0.152
30
0.141
35
0.125
40
0.119
45
0.117
50
0.106
75
0.086
100
0.074
The plotting
on Weibull paper shows the raw data. And from Table 1.2
upper and lower lines for 90% confidence may be plotted with respect to
the raw data. Then a computer solution must yield a//so that the sloped
line passes through the raw data and is between the confidence lines
Pf(R.d) - K <_ Pf <_ Pf(R.d)
(1.43)
V. GOODNESS OF FIT TESTS
The following tests [1.5,1.17,l.18,1.23]
should be mentioned and judgment
should be exercised as to how much information is desired.
11
Table 1.2 90% confidence bounds
on the Weibull line [1.1]
Sample size (n)
K(n)
3
0.540
4
0.420
5
0.380
6
0.338
7
0.307
8
0.284
9
0.269
10
0.246
11
0.237
12
0.222
13
0.213
14
0.204
15
0.197
20
0.169
25
0.152
30
0.141
35
0.125
40
0.119
45
0.117
50
0.106
75
0.086
100
0.074
The plotting
on Weibull paper shows the raw data. And from Table 1.2
upper and lower lines for 90% confidence may be plotted with respect to
the raw data. Then a computer solution must yield a//so that the sloped
line passes through the raw data and is between the confidence lines
Pf(R.d) - K <_ Pf <_ Pf(R.d)
(1.43)
V. GOODNESS OF FIT TESTS
The following tests [1.5,1.17,l.18,1.23]
should be mentioned and judgment
should be exercised as to how much information is desired.
