50 Evaluation of the New Version of Stratospheric Chemistry
Module of the SILAM CTM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
Risto Hänninen, Mikhail Sofiev, Rostislav Kouznetsov
and Viktoria Sofieva
51 Lightning NO X Distribution and Its Impact on Ozone Over
the Contiguous United States During 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, George Pouliot,
David Wong, Kristen Foley, Wyat Appel and Shawn Roselle
52 Is a Model’s Scatter Really “Very Small” or Is Model A Really
“Performing Better” Than Model B? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
Steven Hanna and Joseph Chang
53 Sensitivity of Atmospheric Composition Mesoscale Simulations
in the Mediterranean to the Meteorological Data and Chemical
Boundary Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
D. G. Amanatidis, S. Myriokefalitakis, Georgios Fanourgakis,
N. Daskalakis and Maria Kanakidou
54 Quantification of Uncertainty in Lagrangian Dispersion
Modelling, Using ECMWF’s New ERA5 Ensemble . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
Andy Delcloo and Pieter De Meutter
55 Assessment of Fine-Scale Dispersion Modelling for Near-Road
Exposure Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
Jennifer L. Moutinho, Donghai Liang, Jeremy Sarnat
and Armistead G. Russell
56 Detailed Assessment of a Smog Situation Detected
in the Sajó Valley, Hungary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
Zita Ferenczi, Emese Homolya and László Bozó
57 Comparison of the Performance of AERMOD and CALPUFF
Dispersion Model Outputs to Monitored Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
Jackson Mak, Camille Taylor, Melanie Fillingham
and Jamie McEvoy
58 Model of Arrival Time for Gas Clouds in Urban Canopy . . . . . . . 363
Hana Chaloupecká, Zbyněk Jaňour, Klára Jurčáková
and Radka Kellnerová
Part VI Aerosols in the Atmosphere
59 Evaluation of Seven Chemical Aging Modeling Schemes
with the 2D-VBS Framework Against Ground and Airborne
PEGASOS Campaign Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
Eleni Karnezi, Benjamin N. Murphy and Spyros N. Pandis
Contents
xxiii
Module of the SILAM CTM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
Risto Hänninen, Mikhail Sofiev, Rostislav Kouznetsov
and Viktoria Sofieva
51 Lightning NO X Distribution and Its Impact on Ozone Over
the Contiguous United States During 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, George Pouliot,
David Wong, Kristen Foley, Wyat Appel and Shawn Roselle
52 Is a Model’s Scatter Really “Very Small” or Is Model A Really
“Performing Better” Than Model B? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
Steven Hanna and Joseph Chang
53 Sensitivity of Atmospheric Composition Mesoscale Simulations
in the Mediterranean to the Meteorological Data and Chemical
Boundary Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
D. G. Amanatidis, S. Myriokefalitakis, Georgios Fanourgakis,
N. Daskalakis and Maria Kanakidou
54 Quantification of Uncertainty in Lagrangian Dispersion
Modelling, Using ECMWF’s New ERA5 Ensemble . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
Andy Delcloo and Pieter De Meutter
55 Assessment of Fine-Scale Dispersion Modelling for Near-Road
Exposure Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
Jennifer L. Moutinho, Donghai Liang, Jeremy Sarnat
and Armistead G. Russell
56 Detailed Assessment of a Smog Situation Detected
in the Sajó Valley, Hungary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
Zita Ferenczi, Emese Homolya and László Bozó
57 Comparison of the Performance of AERMOD and CALPUFF
Dispersion Model Outputs to Monitored Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
Jackson Mak, Camille Taylor, Melanie Fillingham
and Jamie McEvoy
58 Model of Arrival Time for Gas Clouds in Urban Canopy . . . . . . . 363
Hana Chaloupecká, Zbyněk Jaňour, Klára Jurčáková
and Radka Kellnerová
Part VI Aerosols in the Atmosphere
59 Evaluation of Seven Chemical Aging Modeling Schemes
with the 2D-VBS Framework Against Ground and Airborne
PEGASOS Campaign Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
Eleni Karnezi, Benjamin N. Murphy and Spyros N. Pandis
Contents
xxiii