44
V. A. Gushchin et al.
4.4.3 Comparison of Results Using SMIF and CABARET
Methods
The comparison of results calculated by SMIF (solid lines) and CABARET (dotted
lines) methods is demonstrated in Figs. 4.4 and 4.5, respectively. Calculations were
carried out for Re = 100, Fr = 0.1. The sizes of spatial greed were the same in both
cases. In Fig. 4.4, the dependence of horizontal size of spot from time is shown.
The dependence of vertical sizes of spot from time is seen in Fig. 4.5. Some small
Fig. 4.4 Dependence of the horizontal size of the spot from time. CABARET area [−15; 15] ×
[−5;5], mesh 300 × 100; SMIF area [0;15] × [−5; 5], mesh 150 × 100
Fig. 4.5 Dependence of the vertical size of the spot from time. CABARET area [−15; 15] × [−5;
5], mesh 300 × 100; SMIF area [0; 15] × [−5; 5], mesh 150 × 100
V. A. Gushchin et al.
4.4.3 Comparison of Results Using SMIF and CABARET
Methods
The comparison of results calculated by SMIF (solid lines) and CABARET (dotted
lines) methods is demonstrated in Figs. 4.4 and 4.5, respectively. Calculations were
carried out for Re = 100, Fr = 0.1. The sizes of spatial greed were the same in both
cases. In Fig. 4.4, the dependence of horizontal size of spot from time is shown.
The dependence of vertical sizes of spot from time is seen in Fig. 4.5. Some small
Fig. 4.4 Dependence of the horizontal size of the spot from time. CABARET area [−15; 15] ×
[−5;5], mesh 300 × 100; SMIF area [0;15] × [−5; 5], mesh 150 × 100
Fig. 4.5 Dependence of the vertical size of the spot from time. CABARET area [−15; 15] × [−5;
5], mesh 300 × 100; SMIF area [0; 15] × [−5; 5], mesh 150 × 100
