71. Agenson KO, Oh J-I, Urase T (2003) Retention of a wide variety of organic pollutants by
different nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes: controlling parameters of process. J
Membr Sci 225(1–2):91–103
72. Hofman JAMH, Gijsbertsen AJ, Cornelissen E (2007) Nanofiltration retention models for
organic contaminants. Water Research Foundation, Denver, p 167
73. Nghiem LD, Schäfer AI (2002) Adsorption and transport of trace contaminant Estrone in NF/
RO membranes. Environ Eng Sci 19(6):441–451
74. Vogel D, Simon A, Alturki AA, Bilitewski B, Price WE, Nghiem LD (2010) Effects of fouling
and scaling on the retention of trace organic contaminants by a nanofiltration membrane: the
role of cake-enhanced concentration polarisation. Sep Purif Technol 73(2):256–263
75. Xu P, Drewes JE, Kim T-U, Bellona C, Amy G (2006) Effect of membrane fouling on
transport of organic contaminants in NF/RO membrane applications. J Membr Sci 279(1–
2):165–175
76. Nghiem LD, Manis A, Soldenhoff K, Schäfer AI (2004) Estrogenic hormone removal from
wastewater using NF/RO membranes. J Membr Sci 242(1):37–45
77. Nguyen LN, Hai FI, Kang J, Price WE, Nghiem LD (2013) Removal of emerging trace organic
contaminants by MBR-based hybrid treatment processes. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation
85:474–482
78. Verliefde ARD, Heijman SGJ, Cornelissen ER, Amy GL, Van der Bruggen B, van Dijk JC
(2008) Rejection of trace organic pollutants with high pressure membranes (NF/RO). Environ
Prog 27(2):180–188
79. Nghiem LD (2005) Removal of emerging trace organic contaminants by nanofiltration and
reverse osmosis. University of Wollongong, Wollongong
80. Agus E, Sedlak DL (2010) Formation and fate of chlorination by-products in reverse osmosis
desalination systems. Water Res 44(5):1616–1626
81. Bellona C, Drewes JE, Xu P, Amy G (2004) Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes
during NF/RO treatment-a literature review. Water Res 38(12):2795–2809
82. Nghiem LD, Schäfer AI, Elimelech M (2004) Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration
membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 38(6):1888–
1896
83. Steinle-Darling E, Litwiller E, Reinhard M (2010) Effects of sorption on the rejection of trace
organic contaminants during nanofiltration. Environ Sci Technol 44:2592–2598
84. Xu P, Drewes JE, Bellona C, Amy G, Kim T-U, Adam M, Heberer T (2005) Rejection of
emerging organic micropollutants in Nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
Water Environ Res 77(1):40–48
85. Ben-David A, Bernstein R, Oren Y, Belfer S, Dosoretz C, Freger V (2010) Facile surface
modification of nanofiltration membranes to target the removal of endocrine-disrupting compounds. J Membr Sci 357(1–2):152–159
86. Bellona C, Drewes JE (2005) The role of membrane surface charge and solute physicochemical properties in the rejection of organic acids by NF membranes. J Membr Sci 249
(1–2):227–234
87. Nghiem LD, Hawkes S (2007) Effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): mechanisms and role of membrane pore size. Sep Purif
Technol 57(1):176–184
88. Sharma RR, Agrawal R, Chellam S (2003) Temperature effects on sieving characteristics of
thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes: pore size distributions and transport parameters. J Membr Sci 223(1–2):69–87
89. Wei C-H, Zhang X-X, Ren Y, Yu X-B (2011) George A (ed) Biomimetic based applications.
InTech, Croatia, pp 285–310
90. Binyam S, Mukhtar H, Leong LK (2009) Flux and rejection on monoethanolamine (MEA) in
wastewater using membrane technology. IWTC, Hurghada, pp 139–151
Contemporary Methods for Removal of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in. . .
237
Précédent

- 244/342

Suivant