Example The massless beam with two point-masses in Fig. 1.7(a) has two
degrees of freedom. Fig. 1.7(b) shows the system stripped from its masses, whose
influence are replaced by forces f 1 and f 2 . These same forces appear as oppositely
directed reaction forces in Fig. 1.7(c), showing the free-body diagrams for the
masses. Using the flexibility method we start by writing the components of the
linear force relation x = Af:
x 1
x 2
& '
¼
a 11 f 1 þ a 12 f 2
a 21 f 1 þ a 22 f 2
&
'
:
ð1:120Þ
Using the above boxed rule and Fig. 1.7(b) we find, using a lookup table (e.g.
Gere and Timoshenko 1997; Gross et al. 2011) for a simply supported beam:
a 11 ¼ ( value of x 1 when f 1 ¼ 1 and f 2 ¼ 0Þ ¼
4l
3
243EI
;
a 12 ¼ ( value of x 1 when f 2 ¼ 1 and f 1 ¼ 0Þ ¼
7l
3
486EI
;
a 21 ¼ ( value of x 2 when f 1 ¼ 1 and f 2 ¼ 0Þ ¼
7l
3
486EI
;
a 22 ¼ ( value of x 2 when f 2 ¼ 1 and f 1 ¼ 0Þ ¼
4l
3
243EI
:
ð1:121Þ
Fig. 1.7 Stiffness method example system
1.8 The Stiffness and Flexibility Methods for Deriving Equations of Motion
39
degrees of freedom. Fig. 1.7(b) shows the system stripped from its masses, whose
influence are replaced by forces f 1 and f 2 . These same forces appear as oppositely
directed reaction forces in Fig. 1.7(c), showing the free-body diagrams for the
masses. Using the flexibility method we start by writing the components of the
linear force relation x = Af:
x 1
x 2
& '
¼
a 11 f 1 þ a 12 f 2
a 21 f 1 þ a 22 f 2
&
'
:
ð1:120Þ
Using the above boxed rule and Fig. 1.7(b) we find, using a lookup table (e.g.
Gere and Timoshenko 1997; Gross et al. 2011) for a simply supported beam:
a 11 ¼ ( value of x 1 when f 1 ¼ 1 and f 2 ¼ 0Þ ¼
4l
3
243EI
;
a 12 ¼ ( value of x 1 when f 2 ¼ 1 and f 1 ¼ 0Þ ¼
7l
3
486EI
;
a 21 ¼ ( value of x 2 when f 1 ¼ 1 and f 2 ¼ 0Þ ¼
7l
3
486EI
;
a 22 ¼ ( value of x 2 when f 2 ¼ 1 and f 1 ¼ 0Þ ¼
4l
3
243EI
:
ð1:121Þ
Fig. 1.7 Stiffness method example system
1.8 The Stiffness and Flexibility Methods for Deriving Equations of Motion
39
