Recent Developments in Food-Based
Bioplastics Production
Babuskin Srinivasan and Garima Kulshreshtha
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
1.1 Global Production and Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
2 Classification of Bioplastics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
2.1 Starch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
2.2 Cellulose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
2.3 Polylactic Acid (PLA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
2.4 Genetically Modified or Naturally Occurring Organism-Based Bioplastics . . . . . . . . . 116
2.5 Multilayer Film Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
3 Active Packaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
3.1 Antimicrobial Packaging Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
3.2 Antioxidant Release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
Abstract The problem of pollution has been rising all over the world right now, and
plastics are the one that plays major role in it, which has been in daily use like
packaging materials, carry bags, manufacturing of different types of materials, etc.
Among them around, 40% are particularly used for the production of food packaging
materials. A feasible way to solve this issue is to gradually decrease the consumption
of plastics prepared of petrochemical origin and subsequently substitute it with
plastics made up of biodegradable materials. The transformation process of
bioplastics materials (starch, polyhydroxyalkanoates, cellulose, and polylactide)
for food packaging applications by employing traditional plastic manufacturing
techniques such as injection molding, extrusion, and compression molding has
B. Srinivasan (*)
Department of Industrial Chemistry, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
e-mail: buski87@gmail.com
G. Kulshreshtha
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa,
Ottawa, ON, Canada
Manuel Jerold, Santhiagu Arockiasamy, and Velmurugan Sivasubramanian (eds.),
Bioprocess Engineering for Bioremediation: Valorization and Management
Techniques, Hdb Env Chem (2020) 104: 107–128, DOI 10.1007/698_2020_578,
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020, Published online: 22 June 2020
107