Economic Complexity and the Environment: Evidence from Brazil
19
Table 2
(continued)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
Dependent variable: deforestation rate
Harvested area
−1.43e−04
−1.43e−04
(1.26e−04)
(1.26e−04)
Planted area
−0.000137
−0.000137
(1.25e−04)
(1.25e−04)
Cattle density
−0.300
−0.293
−0.294
−0.293
−0.294
(0.239)
(0.243)
(0.243)
(0.243)
(0.243)
Constant
−8.012***
−8.008***
−8.025***
−8.017***
−8.034***
(1.435)
(1.444)
(1.443)
(1.452)
(1.451)
Observations
888
862
862
862
862
R-squared
0.011
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.012
Adjusted R-squared
0.00702
0.00514
0.00510
0.00398
0.00394
Notes
Standard errors, in parentheses, are clustered at the municipality-level. All variables are first-differenced. Interpretation
***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1
19
Table 2
(continued)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
Dependent variable: deforestation rate
Harvested area
−1.43e−04
−1.43e−04
(1.26e−04)
(1.26e−04)
Planted area
−0.000137
−0.000137
(1.25e−04)
(1.25e−04)
Cattle density
−0.300
−0.293
−0.294
−0.293
−0.294
(0.239)
(0.243)
(0.243)
(0.243)
(0.243)
Constant
−8.012***
−8.008***
−8.025***
−8.017***
−8.034***
(1.435)
(1.444)
(1.443)
(1.452)
(1.451)
Observations
888
862
862
862
862
R-squared
0.011
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.012
Adjusted R-squared
0.00702
0.00514
0.00510
0.00398
0.00394
Notes
Standard errors, in parentheses, are clustered at the municipality-level. All variables are first-differenced. Interpretation
***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1