4 The Analysis of Event-Related Potentials
81
67. F. Mormann, K. Lehnertz, P. David et al., Mean phase coherence as a measure for phase
synchronization and its application to the EEG of epilepsy patients. Physica D 144, 358–369
(2000)
68. R. Näätänen, A.W.K. Gaillard, S. Mäntysalo, Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Amst) 42, 313–329 (1978)
69. V.V. Nikulin, K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, G. Nolte et al., Non-zero mean and asymmetry of neuronal oscillations have different implications for evoked responses. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121,
186–193 (2010)
70. P.L. Nunez, R. Srinivasan, Electric Field of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG (Oxford
University Press, New York, 2006)
71. R. Oostenveld, P. Fries, E. Maris et al., FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis
of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 1
(2011)
72. T.E. Özkurt, A. Schnitzler, A critical note on the definition of phase-amplitude cross-frequency
coupling. J. Neurosci. Methods 201, 438–443 (2011)
73. S. Palva, J.M. Palva, Discovering oscillatory interaction networks with M/EEG: challenges
and breakthroughs. Trends Cogn Sci 16, 219–230 (2012)
74. R.D. Pascual-Marqui, Instantaneous and lagged measurements of linear and nonlinear
dependence between groups of multivariate time series: frequency decomposition. arXiv:07
11.1455 (2007)
75. F. Pesarin, Multivariate Permutation Tests (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2001)
76. K.M. Petersson, T.E. Nichols, J.-B. Poline et al., Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging II. Signal detection and statistical inference. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 354,
1261–1281 (1999)
77. G. Pfurtscheller, F.H. Lopes da Silva, Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and
desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 1842–1857 (1999)
78. D.-T. Pham, J.-F. Cardoso, Blind separation of instantaneous mixtures of non stationary
sources. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49, 1837–1848 (2001)
79. T.W. Picton, S. Bentin, P. Berg et al., Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to
study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37, 127–152
(2000)
80. E.J.G. Pitman, Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. J.
Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 4, 119–130 (1937)
81. E.J.G. Pitman, Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. II.
The correlation coefficient. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 4, 225–232 (1937)
82. E.J.G. Pitman, Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. III.
The analysis of Variance test. Biometrika 29, 322–335 (1938)
83. B. Rivet, A. Souloumiac, V. Attina et al., xDAWN algorithm to enhance evoked potentials:
application to brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56, 2035–2043 (2009)
84. M.G. Rosenblum, A.S. Pikovsky, J. Kurths, Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804–1807 (1996)
85. D.S. Ruchkin, An analysis of average response computatios based upon aperiodic stimuli.
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 12, 87–94 (1965)
86. S.C. Sereno, K. Rayner, Measuring word recognition in reading: eye-movements and
event-related potentials. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 489–493 (2003)
87. J.D. Storey, A direct approach to false discovery rate. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol.
4, 479–498 (2002)
88. S. Sutton, M. Braren, J. Zubin et al., Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty.
Science 150, 1187–1188 (1965)
89. C. Tallon-Baudry, O. Bertrand, C. Delpuech et al., Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and
non-Phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. J. Neurosci. 16, 4240–4249 (1996)
90. P. Tass, M.G. Rosenblum, J. Weule et al., Detection of n:m phase locking from noisy data:
application to magnetoencephalography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3291–3294 (1998)
81
67. F. Mormann, K. Lehnertz, P. David et al., Mean phase coherence as a measure for phase
synchronization and its application to the EEG of epilepsy patients. Physica D 144, 358–369
(2000)
68. R. Näätänen, A.W.K. Gaillard, S. Mäntysalo, Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Amst) 42, 313–329 (1978)
69. V.V. Nikulin, K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, G. Nolte et al., Non-zero mean and asymmetry of neuronal oscillations have different implications for evoked responses. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121,
186–193 (2010)
70. P.L. Nunez, R. Srinivasan, Electric Field of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG (Oxford
University Press, New York, 2006)
71. R. Oostenveld, P. Fries, E. Maris et al., FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis
of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 1
(2011)
72. T.E. Özkurt, A. Schnitzler, A critical note on the definition of phase-amplitude cross-frequency
coupling. J. Neurosci. Methods 201, 438–443 (2011)
73. S. Palva, J.M. Palva, Discovering oscillatory interaction networks with M/EEG: challenges
and breakthroughs. Trends Cogn Sci 16, 219–230 (2012)
74. R.D. Pascual-Marqui, Instantaneous and lagged measurements of linear and nonlinear
dependence between groups of multivariate time series: frequency decomposition. arXiv:07
11.1455 (2007)
75. F. Pesarin, Multivariate Permutation Tests (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2001)
76. K.M. Petersson, T.E. Nichols, J.-B. Poline et al., Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging II. Signal detection and statistical inference. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 354,
1261–1281 (1999)
77. G. Pfurtscheller, F.H. Lopes da Silva, Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and
desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 1842–1857 (1999)
78. D.-T. Pham, J.-F. Cardoso, Blind separation of instantaneous mixtures of non stationary
sources. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49, 1837–1848 (2001)
79. T.W. Picton, S. Bentin, P. Berg et al., Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to
study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37, 127–152
(2000)
80. E.J.G. Pitman, Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. J.
Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 4, 119–130 (1937)
81. E.J.G. Pitman, Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. II.
The correlation coefficient. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 4, 225–232 (1937)
82. E.J.G. Pitman, Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population. III.
The analysis of Variance test. Biometrika 29, 322–335 (1938)
83. B. Rivet, A. Souloumiac, V. Attina et al., xDAWN algorithm to enhance evoked potentials:
application to brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56, 2035–2043 (2009)
84. M.G. Rosenblum, A.S. Pikovsky, J. Kurths, Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804–1807 (1996)
85. D.S. Ruchkin, An analysis of average response computatios based upon aperiodic stimuli.
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 12, 87–94 (1965)
86. S.C. Sereno, K. Rayner, Measuring word recognition in reading: eye-movements and
event-related potentials. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 489–493 (2003)
87. J.D. Storey, A direct approach to false discovery rate. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol.
4, 479–498 (2002)
88. S. Sutton, M. Braren, J. Zubin et al., Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty.
Science 150, 1187–1188 (1965)
89. C. Tallon-Baudry, O. Bertrand, C. Delpuech et al., Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and
non-Phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. J. Neurosci. 16, 4240–4249 (1996)
90. P. Tass, M.G. Rosenblum, J. Weule et al., Detection of n:m phase locking from noisy data:
application to magnetoencephalography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3291–3294 (1998)