hydrogeologists congress. International Association of Hydrogeologists, Montpellier., Number
Abstract no 1442, p 305
Grant GP (2005) The evolution of complex DNAPL releases: rates of migration and dissolution.
PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. 429 p
Grant GP, Gerhard JI (2007a) Simulating the dissolution of a complex dense nonaqueous phase
liquid source zone: 1. Model to predict interfacial area. Water Resour Res 43:W12410
Grant GP, Gerhard JI (2007b) Simulating the dissolution of a complex dense nonaqueous phase
liquid source zone: 2. Experimental validation of an interfacial area-based mass transfer model.
Water Resour Res 43:W12409
Guarnaccia J, Pinder G, Fishman M (1997) NAPL: simulator documentation. EPA project sumary
(EPA/600/8R-97/102)
Gwo J, Jardine P, Yeh G, Wilson G (1995) MURT user’s guide: a hybrid Lagrangian-Eulerian finite
element model of multiple pore region solute transport through variably saturated subsurface
media. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. Number ORNL/GWPO-015; 128 p
Hampton D, Barrett T, Nayyar H, O’Connell T (1992) Hydrophobic gravel packs for product
monitoring and recovery wells. In: Proceedings national outdoor action conference, National
Ground Water Association, Dublin, OH, USA, pp 581–595
Harendra S, Vipulanandan C (2011) Solubilization and degradation of perchloroethylene (PCE) in
cationic and nonionic surfactant solutions. J Environ Sci 23(8):1240–1248
Harkness M, Konzuk RL (2014) Chapter 16: cost analyses for remedial options. In: Chlorinated
solvent source zone remediation. Springer, SERDP ESTCP Environmental Remediation Technology, New York, NY, Number 978-1-4614-6921-6; 713 p
Helmig R, Braun C, Emmert M (1994) MUFTE: a numerical model for simulation of multiphase
flow processes in porous and fractured porous media. Number Program Documentation
(HG-208). Technical report 94/3, Institut für Wasserbau, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart,
Germany
Heron G, van Zutphen M, Christensen T, Enfield C (1998) Soil heating for enhanced remediation of
chlorinated solvents: a laboratory study on resistive heating and vapor extraction in a silty,
low-permeable soil contaminated with trichloroethylene. Environ Sci Technol 32:1474–1481
Hiemenz PC, Rajagopalan R (1997) Principles of colloid and surface chemistry. Marcel Dekker,
New York, NY. Number 9780824793975; 672 p
Holzmer F, Pope G, Yeh L (2000) Surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation of PCE DNAPL in
low-permeability sand. In: Treating dense nonaqueous-phase liquids (DNAPLs): remediation of
chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp 211–218
Huling SG, Weaver JW (1991) Ground water issue – dense nonaqueous phase liquids. Technical
report EPA/540/4-91-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and
Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC, USA, 21 p.
Huling SG, Weaver JW (1996) Chapter 5: Dense nonaqueous phase liquids. In: Boulding R
(ed) EPA environmental assessment sourcebook. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI. Number
9781575040097; 400 p
Huntley D, Beckett GD (2002) Persistence of LNAPL sources: relationship between risk reduction
and LNAPL recovery. J Contam Hydrol 59(1–2):3–26
Huyakorn PS, Pinder GF (1983) Computational methods in subsurface flow. Academic Press,
New York, NY. Number 978-0-12-363480-1; 473 p
Huyakorn P, Panday S, Wu Y (1994) A three dimensional multiphase flow model for assessing
NAPL contamination in porous and fractured media, 1. Formulation. J Contam Hydrol
16:109–130
Hyman M, Dupont RR (2001) Groundwater and soil remediation: process design and cost estimating of proven technologies. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Press, Reston,
VA. Number 978-0-7844-0427-0; 534 p
Illangasekare TH, Reible DD (2000) Pump-and-treat for remediation and plume containment:
applications, limitations, and relevant processes. In: Kaluarachchi JJ (ed) Groundwater
142
S. Colombano et al.
Abstract no 1442, p 305
Grant GP (2005) The evolution of complex DNAPL releases: rates of migration and dissolution.
PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. 429 p
Grant GP, Gerhard JI (2007a) Simulating the dissolution of a complex dense nonaqueous phase
liquid source zone: 1. Model to predict interfacial area. Water Resour Res 43:W12410
Grant GP, Gerhard JI (2007b) Simulating the dissolution of a complex dense nonaqueous phase
liquid source zone: 2. Experimental validation of an interfacial area-based mass transfer model.
Water Resour Res 43:W12409
Guarnaccia J, Pinder G, Fishman M (1997) NAPL: simulator documentation. EPA project sumary
(EPA/600/8R-97/102)
Gwo J, Jardine P, Yeh G, Wilson G (1995) MURT user’s guide: a hybrid Lagrangian-Eulerian finite
element model of multiple pore region solute transport through variably saturated subsurface
media. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. Number ORNL/GWPO-015; 128 p
Hampton D, Barrett T, Nayyar H, O’Connell T (1992) Hydrophobic gravel packs for product
monitoring and recovery wells. In: Proceedings national outdoor action conference, National
Ground Water Association, Dublin, OH, USA, pp 581–595
Harendra S, Vipulanandan C (2011) Solubilization and degradation of perchloroethylene (PCE) in
cationic and nonionic surfactant solutions. J Environ Sci 23(8):1240–1248
Harkness M, Konzuk RL (2014) Chapter 16: cost analyses for remedial options. In: Chlorinated
solvent source zone remediation. Springer, SERDP ESTCP Environmental Remediation Technology, New York, NY, Number 978-1-4614-6921-6; 713 p
Helmig R, Braun C, Emmert M (1994) MUFTE: a numerical model for simulation of multiphase
flow processes in porous and fractured porous media. Number Program Documentation
(HG-208). Technical report 94/3, Institut für Wasserbau, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart,
Germany
Heron G, van Zutphen M, Christensen T, Enfield C (1998) Soil heating for enhanced remediation of
chlorinated solvents: a laboratory study on resistive heating and vapor extraction in a silty,
low-permeable soil contaminated with trichloroethylene. Environ Sci Technol 32:1474–1481
Hiemenz PC, Rajagopalan R (1997) Principles of colloid and surface chemistry. Marcel Dekker,
New York, NY. Number 9780824793975; 672 p
Holzmer F, Pope G, Yeh L (2000) Surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation of PCE DNAPL in
low-permeability sand. In: Treating dense nonaqueous-phase liquids (DNAPLs): remediation of
chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp 211–218
Huling SG, Weaver JW (1991) Ground water issue – dense nonaqueous phase liquids. Technical
report EPA/540/4-91-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and
Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC, USA, 21 p.
Huling SG, Weaver JW (1996) Chapter 5: Dense nonaqueous phase liquids. In: Boulding R
(ed) EPA environmental assessment sourcebook. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI. Number
9781575040097; 400 p
Huntley D, Beckett GD (2002) Persistence of LNAPL sources: relationship between risk reduction
and LNAPL recovery. J Contam Hydrol 59(1–2):3–26
Huyakorn PS, Pinder GF (1983) Computational methods in subsurface flow. Academic Press,
New York, NY. Number 978-0-12-363480-1; 473 p
Huyakorn P, Panday S, Wu Y (1994) A three dimensional multiphase flow model for assessing
NAPL contamination in porous and fractured media, 1. Formulation. J Contam Hydrol
16:109–130
Hyman M, Dupont RR (2001) Groundwater and soil remediation: process design and cost estimating of proven technologies. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Press, Reston,
VA. Number 978-0-7844-0427-0; 534 p
Illangasekare TH, Reible DD (2000) Pump-and-treat for remediation and plume containment:
applications, limitations, and relevant processes. In: Kaluarachchi JJ (ed) Groundwater
142
S. Colombano et al.