Big data 185
author, Liz McFall, illustrates in tracking these changes, insurance companies remain an embedded part of everyday life and urban places. Thus, it
appears likely – and as signposted in proceeding chapters – the spatial and
temporal variegations of insurance logics may hold little transform power
beyond the hegemonic.
References
Booth, K 2020, ‘Insurance, and the prospects of insurability’, In Wojcik, D & KnoxHayes, J (eds.), Routledge handbook of financial geography, Routledge: London,
pp. 400–420.
Lobo-Guerrero, L 2014, ‘The capitalisation of “excess life” through life insurance’,
Global Society, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 300–316.
McFall, L & Moor, L 2018, ‘Who, or what, is insurtech personalizing?: Persons,
prices and the historical classifications of risk’, Distinktion: Journal of Social
Theory, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 193–213.
VanderLinden, S.L.B, Millie, S.M, Anderson, N & Chishti, S (eds.) 2018, The
INSURTECH book: The insurance technology handbook for investors, entrepreneurs and FinTech visionaries, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Watkins, J 2015, ‘Spatial imaginaries research in geography: Synergies, tensions,
and new directions’, Geography Compass, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 508–522.
Yates, J 2005, Structuring the Information age: Life Insurance and Technology in the
Twentieth Century, Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.
Précédent

- 202/249

Suivant