Biocultural Rights and Protocols in the Pacific 219
NHMRC. (2018b). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.
https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/research-policy/ethics/national-statement-ethicalconduct-human-research
Parks, L. (2018). Challenging Power from the Bottom Up? Community Protocols,
Benefit-sharing, and the Challenge of Dominant Discourses. Geoforum, 88, 87–95.
Pierotti, R., & Wildcat, D. (2000). Traditional Ecological Knowledge: The Third
Alternative. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1333–1340.
Preston, L. E. (1998). Agents, Stewards, and Stakeholders. The Academy of Management
Review, 23(1), 9–13.
Raven, M. (2010). Protocols: Devices for Translating Moralities, Controlling Knowledge,
Defining Actors in Indigenous Research, and Critical Ethical Reflection. Australian
Aboriginal Studies, 2, 33–47.
Robinson, D. (2010). Confronting Biopiracy: Challenges, Cases and International Debates.
Earthscan/Routledge.
Robinson, D. F. (2014). Biodiversity, Access and Benefit-sharing: Global Case Studies.
Routledge.
Robinson, D., & Raven, M. (2017). Identifying and Preventing Biopiracy in Australia:
Patent Landscapes and Legal Geographies for Plants with Indigenous Australian Uses.
Australian Geographer, 48(3), 311–331.
Robinson, D. F., & Forsyth, M. (2016). People, Plants, Place, and Rules: The Nagoya
Protocol in Pacific Island Countries. Geographical Research, 54(3), 324–335.
Robinson, D. F., & Raven, M. (2020). Recognising Indigenous Customary Law of
Totemic Plant Species: Challenges and Pathways. The Geographical Journal, 186(1),
31–44.
Schillemans, T. (2013). Moving Beyond the Clash of Interests: On Stewardship Theory
and the Relationships between Central Government Departments and Public
Agencies. Public Management Review, 15(4), 541–562.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2011). Nagoya Protocol on Access
to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from
their Utilization. To the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 9 September
2014, from http://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf
Stanner, W. E. (1953). The Dreaming. ABC Press.
Stephens, C., Parkes, M. W., & Chang, H. (2007). Indigenous Perspectives on E cosystem
Sustainability and Health. EcoHealth, 4(4), 369–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10393-007-0140-2
Stone, D. (1966). Self‐Government in the Cook Islands 1965. The Journal of Pacific History,
1(1), 168–178.
Su, C. (2018). Towards New Ethics Protocols for Community-Based Research. URBAN
Research Network Working Paper 2018, 1–18. http://urbanresearchnetwork.org/
wp-content/uploads/2018/06/community-protocols-urban.pdf
Suvanto, S. (2020). The Protection of Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic
Resources by using Community Protocols. University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/
URN:NBN:fi:hulib-202008263871
Tonkinson, R. (1982). National Identity and the Problem of Kastom in Vanuatu. Ma nkind,
13(4), 306–315.
Van Slyke, D. M. (2006). Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the
Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship. Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187.
NHMRC. (2018b). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.
https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/research-policy/ethics/national-statement-ethicalconduct-human-research
Parks, L. (2018). Challenging Power from the Bottom Up? Community Protocols,
Benefit-sharing, and the Challenge of Dominant Discourses. Geoforum, 88, 87–95.
Pierotti, R., & Wildcat, D. (2000). Traditional Ecological Knowledge: The Third
Alternative. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1333–1340.
Preston, L. E. (1998). Agents, Stewards, and Stakeholders. The Academy of Management
Review, 23(1), 9–13.
Raven, M. (2010). Protocols: Devices for Translating Moralities, Controlling Knowledge,
Defining Actors in Indigenous Research, and Critical Ethical Reflection. Australian
Aboriginal Studies, 2, 33–47.
Robinson, D. (2010). Confronting Biopiracy: Challenges, Cases and International Debates.
Earthscan/Routledge.
Robinson, D. F. (2014). Biodiversity, Access and Benefit-sharing: Global Case Studies.
Routledge.
Robinson, D., & Raven, M. (2017). Identifying and Preventing Biopiracy in Australia:
Patent Landscapes and Legal Geographies for Plants with Indigenous Australian Uses.
Australian Geographer, 48(3), 311–331.
Robinson, D. F., & Forsyth, M. (2016). People, Plants, Place, and Rules: The Nagoya
Protocol in Pacific Island Countries. Geographical Research, 54(3), 324–335.
Robinson, D. F., & Raven, M. (2020). Recognising Indigenous Customary Law of
Totemic Plant Species: Challenges and Pathways. The Geographical Journal, 186(1),
31–44.
Schillemans, T. (2013). Moving Beyond the Clash of Interests: On Stewardship Theory
and the Relationships between Central Government Departments and Public
Agencies. Public Management Review, 15(4), 541–562.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2011). Nagoya Protocol on Access
to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from
their Utilization. To the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 9 September
2014, from http://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf
Stanner, W. E. (1953). The Dreaming. ABC Press.
Stephens, C., Parkes, M. W., & Chang, H. (2007). Indigenous Perspectives on E cosystem
Sustainability and Health. EcoHealth, 4(4), 369–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10393-007-0140-2
Stone, D. (1966). Self‐Government in the Cook Islands 1965. The Journal of Pacific History,
1(1), 168–178.
Su, C. (2018). Towards New Ethics Protocols for Community-Based Research. URBAN
Research Network Working Paper 2018, 1–18. http://urbanresearchnetwork.org/
wp-content/uploads/2018/06/community-protocols-urban.pdf
Suvanto, S. (2020). The Protection of Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic
Resources by using Community Protocols. University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/
URN:NBN:fi:hulib-202008263871
Tonkinson, R. (1982). National Identity and the Problem of Kastom in Vanuatu. Ma nkind,
13(4), 306–315.
Van Slyke, D. M. (2006). Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the
Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship. Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187.