21
Permeable Reactive Barriers
Guerin T.F., Horner S., Mc Govern T., Davey B. 2002. An application of permeable reactive barrier technology to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater.
Water Research 36:15–24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00233-0.
Haggerty G.M., Bowman R.S. 1994. Sorption of chromate and other inorganic anions
by organo-zeolite. Environmental Science & Technology 28:452–458.
Han I., Schlautman M.A., Batchelor B. 2000. Removal of hexavalent chromium from
groundwater by granular activated carbon. Water Environment Research 72(1):
29–39, Water Environment Federation.
Henderson A.D., Demond A.H. 2007. Long-term performance of zero-valent iron
permeable reactive barriers: A critical review. Environmental Engineering Science
24:401–423.
Huttenloch P., Roehl K.E., Czurda K. 2003. Use of copper shaving store move mercury from contaminated groundwater or waste water by amalgamation.
Environmental Science & Technology 37:4269–4273. DOI:10.1021/es020237q.
Hyman M., Dupont R.R. 2001. Groundwater and Soil Remediation: Process Design and
Cost Estimating of Proven Technologies. ASCE Publications, Reston, VA. Doi:
10.1061/9780784404270.
ITRC. 2011. Permeable Reactive Barrier: Technology Update, The Interstate
Technology & Regulatory Council PRB: Technology Update Team. Washington,
DC. http://www.itrcweb.org/Guidance/GetDocument?documentID=69.
Joo S.H., Feitz A.J., Waite T.D. 2004. Oxidative degradation of the carbothioate herbicide, molinate, using nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environmental Science &
Technology 38:2242–2247. DOI:10.1021/es035157g.
Khan F.I., Husain T., Hejazi R. 2004. An overview and analysis of site remediation
technologies. Journal of Environmental Management 71:95–122. DOI:http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.003.
Leeson A., Stroo H.F., Johnson P.C. 2013. Groundwater remediation today and challenges and opportunities for the future. Groundwater 51:175–179. DOI:10.1111/
gwat.12039.
Leyva A.G., Marrero J., Smichowski P., Cicerone D. 2001. Sorption of antimony on to
hydroxyapatite. Environmental Science and Technology 35:3669–3675.
Li Z., Roy S.J., Zou Y., Bowman R.S. 1998. Long-term chemical and biological stability
of surfactant-modified zeolite. Environmental Science & Technology 32:2628–2632.
Liang L., Sullivan A.B., West O.R., Moline G.R., Kamolpornwijit W. 2003. Predicting
the precipitation of mineral phases in permeable reactive barriers. Environmental
Engineering Science 20:635–653.
McLaughlan R., Merrick N., Davis G.B. 2006. Natural attenuation: A scoping review,
CRCCARE Technical Report no. 2, CRC for Contamination Assessment and
Remediation of the Environment, Adelaide, Australia.
Meggyes T., Simon F.-G. 2000. Removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from
groundwater using permeable reactive barriers. Land Contamination &
Reclamation 8:3.
Meza I. 2009. The use of PRBs (permeable reactive barriers) for attenuation of cadmium and hexavalent chromium from industrial contaminated soil. Thesis submitted to the Graduate School, Ball State University.
Naidu R. 1996. Contaminants and the soil environment in the Australasia-Pacific
region. Proceedings of the First Australasia-Pacific Conference on Contaminants
and Soil Environment in the Australasia-Pacific Region, heldin Adelaide,Australia,
February 18–23, 1996, 1st Australasia-Pacific Conference on Contaminants and
Permeable Reactive Barriers
Guerin T.F., Horner S., Mc Govern T., Davey B. 2002. An application of permeable reactive barrier technology to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater.
Water Research 36:15–24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00233-0.
Haggerty G.M., Bowman R.S. 1994. Sorption of chromate and other inorganic anions
by organo-zeolite. Environmental Science & Technology 28:452–458.
Han I., Schlautman M.A., Batchelor B. 2000. Removal of hexavalent chromium from
groundwater by granular activated carbon. Water Environment Research 72(1):
29–39, Water Environment Federation.
Henderson A.D., Demond A.H. 2007. Long-term performance of zero-valent iron
permeable reactive barriers: A critical review. Environmental Engineering Science
24:401–423.
Huttenloch P., Roehl K.E., Czurda K. 2003. Use of copper shaving store move mercury from contaminated groundwater or waste water by amalgamation.
Environmental Science & Technology 37:4269–4273. DOI:10.1021/es020237q.
Hyman M., Dupont R.R. 2001. Groundwater and Soil Remediation: Process Design and
Cost Estimating of Proven Technologies. ASCE Publications, Reston, VA. Doi:
10.1061/9780784404270.
ITRC. 2011. Permeable Reactive Barrier: Technology Update, The Interstate
Technology & Regulatory Council PRB: Technology Update Team. Washington,
DC. http://www.itrcweb.org/Guidance/GetDocument?documentID=69.
Joo S.H., Feitz A.J., Waite T.D. 2004. Oxidative degradation of the carbothioate herbicide, molinate, using nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environmental Science &
Technology 38:2242–2247. DOI:10.1021/es035157g.
Khan F.I., Husain T., Hejazi R. 2004. An overview and analysis of site remediation
technologies. Journal of Environmental Management 71:95–122. DOI:http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.003.
Leeson A., Stroo H.F., Johnson P.C. 2013. Groundwater remediation today and challenges and opportunities for the future. Groundwater 51:175–179. DOI:10.1111/
gwat.12039.
Leyva A.G., Marrero J., Smichowski P., Cicerone D. 2001. Sorption of antimony on to
hydroxyapatite. Environmental Science and Technology 35:3669–3675.
Li Z., Roy S.J., Zou Y., Bowman R.S. 1998. Long-term chemical and biological stability
of surfactant-modified zeolite. Environmental Science & Technology 32:2628–2632.
Liang L., Sullivan A.B., West O.R., Moline G.R., Kamolpornwijit W. 2003. Predicting
the precipitation of mineral phases in permeable reactive barriers. Environmental
Engineering Science 20:635–653.
McLaughlan R., Merrick N., Davis G.B. 2006. Natural attenuation: A scoping review,
CRCCARE Technical Report no. 2, CRC for Contamination Assessment and
Remediation of the Environment, Adelaide, Australia.
Meggyes T., Simon F.-G. 2000. Removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from
groundwater using permeable reactive barriers. Land Contamination &
Reclamation 8:3.
Meza I. 2009. The use of PRBs (permeable reactive barriers) for attenuation of cadmium and hexavalent chromium from industrial contaminated soil. Thesis submitted to the Graduate School, Ball State University.
Naidu R. 1996. Contaminants and the soil environment in the Australasia-Pacific
region. Proceedings of the First Australasia-Pacific Conference on Contaminants
and Soil Environment in the Australasia-Pacific Region, heldin Adelaide,Australia,
February 18–23, 1996, 1st Australasia-Pacific Conference on Contaminants and