1. Powell, R. M., D. W. Blowes, R. W. Gillham, D. Schultz, T. Sivavec, R. W. Puls, J. L.
Vogan, P. D. Powell, and R. Landis. 1998. Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for
Contaminant Remediation. Washington: United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA/600/R-98/125).
2. Puls, R. W., C. J. Paula, and R. M. Powell. 1999. The application of in situ
permeable reactive (zero-valent iron) barrier technology for the remediation of
chromate-contaminated groundwater: A field test. App. Geochem. 14: 989–1000.
3. Gavaskar, A. R. 1999. Design and construction techniques for permeable reactive barriers. J. Hazard. Mat. 68: 41–71.
4. Scherer, M. M., S. Richter, R. L. Valentine, and P. J. J. Alvarez. 2000. Chemistry
and microbiology of permeable reactive barriers for in situ groundwater clean
up. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30: 363–411.
5. Simon, F.-G., T. Meggyes, and C. McDonald. 2002.
Advanced Groundwater
Remediation: Active and Passive Technologies. London: European Science Foundation,
Thomas Telford Publishing.
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. Contaminated site clean-up information. http://www.clu-in.org (accessed March 20, 2014).
7. Thiruvenkatachari, R., S. Vigneswaran, and R. Naidu. 2008. Permeable reactive
barrier for groundwater remediation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 14: 145–156.
8. Meggyes, T., M. CsÖvári, K. E. Roehl, and F.-G. Simon. 2009. Enhancing the efficacy of permeable reactive barriers. Land Contam. Reclam. 17: 635–650.
9. RUBIN. 2007. German Permeable Reactive Barrier Network. http:/ /www .
rubin-online.de (accessed March 20, 2014).
10. KORA. 2008. Retention and degradation processes to reduce contaminants in
groundwater and soil. http:/ /www .natural-attenuation.de (accessed March 20,
2014).
11. Ward, T. M. and F. W. Getzen. 1970. Influence of pH on the adsorption of aromatic acids on activated carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4: 64–67.
12. Laszlo, K., E. Tombacz, and C. Novak. 2007. pH-dependent adsorption and
desorption of phenol and aniline on basic activated carbon. Colloids Surf. A.:
Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 306: 95–101.
13. Worch, E. 1986. Untersuchungen zur Einzel- und Gemischadsorption von
Phenolen an Aktivkohlen. Teil 3: Zur pH-Abhängigkeit der Adsorptionsgleichgewichte (Studies on single and mixed adsorption of phenols on activated
carbons. Part 3: The pH dependence of adsorption equilibria). Acta Hydrochim.
Hydrobiol. 14: 407–413
14. Muller, G., C. J. Radke, and J. M. Prausnitz. 1980. Adsorption of weak organic
electrolytes from aqueous solution on activated carbon. Effect of pH. J. Phys.
Chem. 84: 369–376.
15. Seidel, A. and K.-H. Radeke. 1990. Effect of pH on adsorption equilibria for dissolved weak organic electrolytes on activated carbon. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol.
18: 691–699.
16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Estimation Programs Interface
Suite
™ for Microsoft ® Windows, v 4.11.
246
Permeable Reactive Barrier
References
Vogan, P. D. Powell, and R. Landis. 1998. Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for
Contaminant Remediation. Washington: United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA/600/R-98/125).
2. Puls, R. W., C. J. Paula, and R. M. Powell. 1999. The application of in situ
permeable reactive (zero-valent iron) barrier technology for the remediation of
chromate-contaminated groundwater: A field test. App. Geochem. 14: 989–1000.
3. Gavaskar, A. R. 1999. Design and construction techniques for permeable reactive barriers. J. Hazard. Mat. 68: 41–71.
4. Scherer, M. M., S. Richter, R. L. Valentine, and P. J. J. Alvarez. 2000. Chemistry
and microbiology of permeable reactive barriers for in situ groundwater clean
up. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30: 363–411.
5. Simon, F.-G., T. Meggyes, and C. McDonald. 2002.
Advanced Groundwater
Remediation: Active and Passive Technologies. London: European Science Foundation,
Thomas Telford Publishing.
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. Contaminated site clean-up information. http://www.clu-in.org (accessed March 20, 2014).
7. Thiruvenkatachari, R., S. Vigneswaran, and R. Naidu. 2008. Permeable reactive
barrier for groundwater remediation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 14: 145–156.
8. Meggyes, T., M. CsÖvári, K. E. Roehl, and F.-G. Simon. 2009. Enhancing the efficacy of permeable reactive barriers. Land Contam. Reclam. 17: 635–650.
9. RUBIN. 2007. German Permeable Reactive Barrier Network. http:/ /www .
rubin-online.de (accessed March 20, 2014).
10. KORA. 2008. Retention and degradation processes to reduce contaminants in
groundwater and soil. http:/ /www .natural-attenuation.de (accessed March 20,
2014).
11. Ward, T. M. and F. W. Getzen. 1970. Influence of pH on the adsorption of aromatic acids on activated carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4: 64–67.
12. Laszlo, K., E. Tombacz, and C. Novak. 2007. pH-dependent adsorption and
desorption of phenol and aniline on basic activated carbon. Colloids Surf. A.:
Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 306: 95–101.
13. Worch, E. 1986. Untersuchungen zur Einzel- und Gemischadsorption von
Phenolen an Aktivkohlen. Teil 3: Zur pH-Abhängigkeit der Adsorptionsgleichgewichte (Studies on single and mixed adsorption of phenols on activated
carbons. Part 3: The pH dependence of adsorption equilibria). Acta Hydrochim.
Hydrobiol. 14: 407–413
14. Muller, G., C. J. Radke, and J. M. Prausnitz. 1980. Adsorption of weak organic
electrolytes from aqueous solution on activated carbon. Effect of pH. J. Phys.
Chem. 84: 369–376.
15. Seidel, A. and K.-H. Radeke. 1990. Effect of pH on adsorption equilibria for dissolved weak organic electrolytes on activated carbon. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol.
18: 691–699.
16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Estimation Programs Interface
Suite
™ for Microsoft ® Windows, v 4.11.
246
Permeable Reactive Barrier
References