Actors and innovators in the bioeconomy 229
Note
1 This section is based on earlier background work reported in Iversen (2016) and
Iversen and Rørstad (2017).
References
BIC Consortium. (2018). Retrieved from https://biconsortium.eu.
biosmart. (2018). Hvordan fremme overgangen til en smart bioøkonomi? Retrieved
from https://biosmart.no/?lang=en.
BIOTEK2021. (2018). Retrieved from www.forskningsradet.no/prognett- biotek
2021/Home_page/1253970728140.
Bjørkhaug, H., Hansen, L. & Zahl- Thanem, A. (2018). Sektorvise scenarier for bioøkonomien. Trondheim: Ruralis – Institutt for rural- og regionalforskning.
bugge, m. m., Hansen, T. & Klitkou, a. (2016). What is the bioeconomy? a review
of the literature. Sustainability, 8(691), 1–22. doi:10.3390/su8070691.
CEPI. (2018). Confederation of European paper industries. Retrieved from www.
cepi.org.
Espelien, A., & Sørvig, Ø. S. (2014). Fornybar energi og miljøteknologi i Norge. Status og
utvikling 2004–2013 (Vol. 34). Oslo: MENON.
EurObserv’ER. (2018). Retrieved from www.eurobserv- er.org.
Frietsch, R., Neuhausler, P., Rothengatter, O. & Jonkers, K. (2016). Societal grand
challenges from a technological perspective: Methods and identification of classes of
the International Patent Classification IPC. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 53.
Iversen, E. J. (2016). The market- square in the circular bio- economy: Empirical strategies.
Conference Poster. Paper presented at the Nordic Research and Innovation Pathways
towards a Circular Bio- economy NoRest Conference Copenhagen.
Iversen, E. J. (2018). The Norwegian Inventory of Bioeconomy Entities (NIoBE) [database].
Oslo: NIFU, Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education
[producer]. Unpublished (publication expected in 2019).
Iversen, E. J., & Rørstad, K. (2017). Empirical strategies to analyze innovative firms in the
bioeconomy. Paper presented at the European Association for Evolutionary Political
economy (eaePe), bremen, Germany.
Kreuchauff, F., & Korzinov, V. (2017). A patent search strategy based on machine
learning for the emerging field of service robotics. Scientometrics, 111(2),
743–772.
LUKE Natural Resources Institute Finland. (2018). Retrieved from www.luke.fi/en.
Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems.
In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 3–22).
New york, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Normann, H. (2018). Mapping activities in the Norwegian organic waste sector: A survey of
Norwegian firms engaged in organic waste activities. Oslo: SusValueWaste project,
University of Oslo/TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture.
Norsk Industri. (2018). Norsk Industri. Retrieved from www.norskindustri.no/
bransjer.
OECD. (2018). Meeting policy challenges for a sustainable bioeconomy. Paris: OECD.
OREEC. (2018). Oslo renewable energy and environment cluster. Retrieved from
http://oreec.no/about.
Note
1 This section is based on earlier background work reported in Iversen (2016) and
Iversen and Rørstad (2017).
References
BIC Consortium. (2018). Retrieved from https://biconsortium.eu.
biosmart. (2018). Hvordan fremme overgangen til en smart bioøkonomi? Retrieved
from https://biosmart.no/?lang=en.
BIOTEK2021. (2018). Retrieved from www.forskningsradet.no/prognett- biotek
2021/Home_page/1253970728140.
Bjørkhaug, H., Hansen, L. & Zahl- Thanem, A. (2018). Sektorvise scenarier for bioøkonomien. Trondheim: Ruralis – Institutt for rural- og regionalforskning.
bugge, m. m., Hansen, T. & Klitkou, a. (2016). What is the bioeconomy? a review
of the literature. Sustainability, 8(691), 1–22. doi:10.3390/su8070691.
CEPI. (2018). Confederation of European paper industries. Retrieved from www.
cepi.org.
Espelien, A., & Sørvig, Ø. S. (2014). Fornybar energi og miljøteknologi i Norge. Status og
utvikling 2004–2013 (Vol. 34). Oslo: MENON.
EurObserv’ER. (2018). Retrieved from www.eurobserv- er.org.
Frietsch, R., Neuhausler, P., Rothengatter, O. & Jonkers, K. (2016). Societal grand
challenges from a technological perspective: Methods and identification of classes of
the International Patent Classification IPC. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 53.
Iversen, E. J. (2016). The market- square in the circular bio- economy: Empirical strategies.
Conference Poster. Paper presented at the Nordic Research and Innovation Pathways
towards a Circular Bio- economy NoRest Conference Copenhagen.
Iversen, E. J. (2018). The Norwegian Inventory of Bioeconomy Entities (NIoBE) [database].
Oslo: NIFU, Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education
[producer]. Unpublished (publication expected in 2019).
Iversen, E. J., & Rørstad, K. (2017). Empirical strategies to analyze innovative firms in the
bioeconomy. Paper presented at the European Association for Evolutionary Political
economy (eaePe), bremen, Germany.
Kreuchauff, F., & Korzinov, V. (2017). A patent search strategy based on machine
learning for the emerging field of service robotics. Scientometrics, 111(2),
743–772.
LUKE Natural Resources Institute Finland. (2018). Retrieved from www.luke.fi/en.
Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems.
In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 3–22).
New york, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Normann, H. (2018). Mapping activities in the Norwegian organic waste sector: A survey of
Norwegian firms engaged in organic waste activities. Oslo: SusValueWaste project,
University of Oslo/TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture.
Norsk Industri. (2018). Norsk Industri. Retrieved from www.norskindustri.no/
bransjer.
OECD. (2018). Meeting policy challenges for a sustainable bioeconomy. Paris: OECD.
OREEC. (2018). Oslo renewable energy and environment cluster. Retrieved from
http://oreec.no/about.