Table 14.6
(continued)
Traditional area sampling frames
Automated area sampling frames
Hybrid area sampling frames
Stratum State
Mean PSU in
square miles
Mean %
Cultivation
Standard
Deviation
Mean PSU in
square miles
Mean %
cultivation
Standard
deviation
Mean PSU in
square miles
Mean %
cultivation
Standard
deviation
20
Oklahoma 5.36
8.0*
11.4
6.01
30.3
10.3
3.85
30.3
10.4
South
Dakota
9.25
20.1
15.6
6.41
33.0
10.2
2.48
32.0
9.7
Arizona
4.68
36.6
28.2
6.40
29.3
10.1
1.97
57.8
28.1
New
Mexico
4.87
21.5
19.9
6.14
31.2
10.4
3.26
39.2
19.8
Georgia
6.04
0.25.7
11.9
6.61
30.2
9.4
2.98
32.5
9.1
Alabama
6.55
10.6*
9.3
6.88
26.8
9.3
2.72
32.4
9.0
North
Carolina
7.31
25.7
14.8
7.35
29.4
9.7
2.88
32.4
8.0
Wisconsin 6.79
23.4
13.0
6.21
31.3
9.9
3.21
30.6
8.9
Nebraska
9.77
21.9
14.9
7.82
32.1
10.3
2.69
31.0
8.5
40
Oklahoma 7.81
3.6
3.5
7.75
2.5
3.7
7.347
4.8
3.9
South
Dakota
19.17
2.7
5.6
13.75
4.1
4.4
19.94
2.4
3.3
Arizona
25.22
0.9
3.7
26.61
0.8
2.4
24.74
2.4
8.6
New
Mexico
23.31
0.5
2.3
20.56
0.1
1.0
24.09
0.9
3.7
Georgia
14.00
3.4
5.1
15.00
2.6
3.6
12.44
3.7
4.9
Alabama
15.24
1.2
2.1
10.35
2.5
3.6
12.89
2.7
4.6
North
Carolina
11.62
3.8
5.0
7.05
4.0
4.3
10.83
5.8
5.6
Wisconsin 12.94
3.2
5.6
7.73
3.3
4.4
10.62
3.4
3.9
Nebraska
23.97
3.1
5.4
16.50
3.8
4.4
7.72
4.3
3.7
Note: Mean percent cultivation and standard deviations based on percent cultivation derived using the NASS 2014 (OK, SD, AZ, NM, GA, AL, and NC)
and 2016 Cultivated Layer (WI and NE)
290
C. G. Boryan and Z. Yang