shown in Table 3 need to be used whenever designers
wish to have adjustable classroom furniture (which is
ergonomic design desktop–chair) in the four selected
tertiary institutions, Uasin-Gishu County, Kenya. In
this study, therefore, there is only one type of innovative ergonomically suitable classroom desktop–chair
design that was proposed to improve the match
between classroom desktop–chairs dimensions and
students’ anthropometric characteristics.
5.2 Recommendation
In this 21st century, it is highly recommended that
the analysed anthropometric data set from this study
be used for the design of classroom desktop–chairs
for students in the four selected tertiary institutions, Uasin-Gishu County, Kenya. Achieving this will
ensure safety, comfort, adaptability, suitability, and
ultimately guarantee user satisfaction. The authors
propose further work on seat chair design for elderly
people should be carried out, with ergonomic and
anthropometric consideration; this will allow seat
chair design that is sustainable, safe, and comfortable
as well as helping in health care.
Lastly, the goal is not to be perfect, it is just to be
better than before (Pusca & Northwood 2018).
REFERENCES
Al-Hinai, N., Al-Kindi, M., & Shamsuzzoha, A. (2018).
An Ergonomic Student Chair Design and Engineering
for Classroom Environment. International Journal of
Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 7(5),
534–543.
Castellucci, I., Gonçalves, A., & Arezes, M. (2010).
Ergonomic Design of School Furniture: Challenges
for the Portuguese Schools. Advances in Occupational,
Social, and Organizational Ergonomics, (April 2015),
625–633.
Chung, Y., & Wong, S. (2007). Anthropometric Evaluation
for Primary School Furniture Design. Ergonomics, 50(3),
323–334.
Esmaeel, A., & Order, S. (2017). International Standard
Technological Design —, 2017.
Igbokwe, O., Osueke, O., Opara, V, Ileagu, O., &
Ezeakaibeya, U. (2019a). Considerations of Anthropometrics in the Design of Lecture Hall Furniture, 7(August),
374–386.
Igbokwe, O., Osueke, O., Opara, V, Ileagu, O., &
Ezeakaibeya, U. (2019b). Considerations of Anthropometrics in the Design of Lecture Hall Furniture, 7(August),
374–386.
Madara, S. (2016). Consumer-Perception on PolyethyleneShopping-Bags Consumer-Perception on PolyethyleneShopping-Bags, (November).
Madara, S., Arusei, K., & Njoroge, N. (2016). Design Simulation and Analysis of Manual Block-Making Machine
Design Simulation andAnalysis of Manual Block-Making
Machine, (August).
Md Yusop, S., Mat, S., Ramli, R., Dullah, R., Khalil, N.,
& Case, K. (2018). Design of Welding Armrest Based
on Ergonomics Analysis: Case Study At Educational
Institution in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. ARPN Journal of
Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(1), 309–313.
Milanese, S., & Grimmer, K. (2004). School Furniture and
the User Population: An Anthropometric Perspective.
Ergonomics, 47(4), 416–426.
Pusca, D., & Northwood, O. (2018). Design Thinking and Its
Application to Problem Solving, (March).
Saarni, L., Nygård, H., Kaukiainen, A., & Rimpelä, A.
(2007). Are the Desks and Chairs At School Appropriate?
Ergonomics, 50(10), 1561–1570.
Taifa, W., & Desai, A. (2017). Anthropometric Measurements
for Ergonomic Design of Students’ Furniture in India.
Engineering Science and Technology, an International
Journal, 20(1), 232–239.
43
Précédent

- 68/340

Suivant