HUMAN ECOLOGY AS AN INTERDISCIPLINARY OONCEPT
99
Mumford, L. (1966). “The Myth of the Machine-Technics and Human DevelopMumford, L. (1968). Archit. Rec. 143, No. 2, 113-116. Architecture as a home for
Mumford, L. (1972). J. Am. Imt. Planners 38, 3-10. Artur Glikson: the planner as
Netting, R. M. (1965). Arathrop. &. 38, 81-96. A trial model of cultural ecology.
Neutra, R. (1954). “Survival Through Design”, p. 384. Oxford Univ. Press,
London.
Newman, M. T. (1953). Am. Arathrop. 66, 311-327. The application of ecological
rules to the racial anthropology of the new world.
Niebuhr, R. (1965). “Man’s Nature and His Communities”, p. 125. Scribners,
New York.
Nisbet, R. A. (1953). “The Quest for Community”, p. 303. Oxford Univ. Press,
New York.
Nisbet, R. A. (1966). “The Sociological Tradition”, p. 349. Basic Books, New
York.
Odum, E. P. (1962). Jap. J. Ecol. 12, 108-118. Relationships between structure
and function in ecosystems.
Odum, E. P. (1969). Science, N.Y. 164, No. 3877, 262-270. The strategy of
ecosystem development.
Odum, H. T. (1962). In “Proceedings of the Lockwood Conference on the
Suburban Forest and Ecology” (P. E. Waggoner and J. D. Ovington, Eds),
pp. 57-75. The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven,
Connecticut. Ecological tools and their use: man and the ecosystem.
Owen, 0. 5. (1971). “Natural Resource Conservation-An Ecological Approach”,
p. 693. The Macmillan Co., New York.
Park, R. E. (1915). Am. J. SocwZ. 20, 577-612. The city: suggestions for the
investigation of human behavior in the city environment.
Park, R. E. (1925). In “The Urban Community” (E. W. Burgess, Ed.), pp. 3-18.
Greenwood Press, New York. The urban community as a spacial pattern
and a moral order.
ment”, p. 342. Harcourt, New York.
man.
ecologist.
Perk, R. E. (1936a). Am. J. Sociol. 42, 1-15. Human ecology.
Park, R. E. (1936b). Am. sociol. Rev. 1, No. 2, 171-179. Succession: an ecological
Park, R. E. (1952). “Human Communities: The City and Human Ecology”.
Park, R. E. and Burgess, E. W. (1921). “Introduction to the Science of Sociology”,
Park, R. E. Burgees, E. W. and Mackenzie, R. D. (1925). “The City”, p. 239.
Pam, A. E. (1963). Arts Archit. 80, 30-31. Mind and milieu: a scientific approach
Parsons, T. (1951). “The Social System”, p. 575. Free Press of Glencoe, New York.
Parsons, T. (1960). “Structure and Process in Modern Society”. Free Press of
Glencoe, New York.
Parsons, T. (1968). In “International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences”
(D. L. Sills, Ed.), Vol. 15, pp. 468-473. Macmillan Co., New York. Systeme
analysis: social systems.
Patten, B. C. (Ed.) (1971). “Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology”,
p. 607. Academic Press, New York.
concept.
The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
p. 1040. Univ. of Chicago Presa, Chicago.
Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago (republished 1967).
t o environment.
99
Mumford, L. (1966). “The Myth of the Machine-Technics and Human DevelopMumford, L. (1968). Archit. Rec. 143, No. 2, 113-116. Architecture as a home for
Mumford, L. (1972). J. Am. Imt. Planners 38, 3-10. Artur Glikson: the planner as
Netting, R. M. (1965). Arathrop. &. 38, 81-96. A trial model of cultural ecology.
Neutra, R. (1954). “Survival Through Design”, p. 384. Oxford Univ. Press,
London.
Newman, M. T. (1953). Am. Arathrop. 66, 311-327. The application of ecological
rules to the racial anthropology of the new world.
Niebuhr, R. (1965). “Man’s Nature and His Communities”, p. 125. Scribners,
New York.
Nisbet, R. A. (1953). “The Quest for Community”, p. 303. Oxford Univ. Press,
New York.
Nisbet, R. A. (1966). “The Sociological Tradition”, p. 349. Basic Books, New
York.
Odum, E. P. (1962). Jap. J. Ecol. 12, 108-118. Relationships between structure
and function in ecosystems.
Odum, E. P. (1969). Science, N.Y. 164, No. 3877, 262-270. The strategy of
ecosystem development.
Odum, H. T. (1962). In “Proceedings of the Lockwood Conference on the
Suburban Forest and Ecology” (P. E. Waggoner and J. D. Ovington, Eds),
pp. 57-75. The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven,
Connecticut. Ecological tools and their use: man and the ecosystem.
Owen, 0. 5. (1971). “Natural Resource Conservation-An Ecological Approach”,
p. 693. The Macmillan Co., New York.
Park, R. E. (1915). Am. J. SocwZ. 20, 577-612. The city: suggestions for the
investigation of human behavior in the city environment.
Park, R. E. (1925). In “The Urban Community” (E. W. Burgess, Ed.), pp. 3-18.
Greenwood Press, New York. The urban community as a spacial pattern
and a moral order.
ment”, p. 342. Harcourt, New York.
man.
ecologist.
Perk, R. E. (1936a). Am. J. Sociol. 42, 1-15. Human ecology.
Park, R. E. (1936b). Am. sociol. Rev. 1, No. 2, 171-179. Succession: an ecological
Park, R. E. (1952). “Human Communities: The City and Human Ecology”.
Park, R. E. and Burgess, E. W. (1921). “Introduction to the Science of Sociology”,
Park, R. E. Burgees, E. W. and Mackenzie, R. D. (1925). “The City”, p. 239.
Pam, A. E. (1963). Arts Archit. 80, 30-31. Mind and milieu: a scientific approach
Parsons, T. (1951). “The Social System”, p. 575. Free Press of Glencoe, New York.
Parsons, T. (1960). “Structure and Process in Modern Society”. Free Press of
Glencoe, New York.
Parsons, T. (1968). In “International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences”
(D. L. Sills, Ed.), Vol. 15, pp. 468-473. Macmillan Co., New York. Systeme
analysis: social systems.
Patten, B. C. (Ed.) (1971). “Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology”,
p. 607. Academic Press, New York.
concept.
The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
p. 1040. Univ. of Chicago Presa, Chicago.
Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago (republished 1967).
t o environment.