FORTY YEARS OF G E N E C O L O G ) ~
243
Gustafsson, A. (1947). Acta Univ. Lmd. N.F. Avd. 2 42-3, 1-307. Apo&i~ in
Habeck, J. R. (1958). Ecology 39,457-63. White cedar ecotypes in Wisconsin.
Harberd, D. J. (1957). New Phytol. 56, 269-280. The within population variance
Harberd D. J. (1958). Rep. Scot. Plant Breeding Stat. 1958. 52-60. Progem and
Harberd, D. J. (1961a). New Phytol. 60, 18k-206. Observations on population
Harberd, D. J. (1961b). New Phytozl 60, 325-338. The case for extensive rather
Harlan, J. R. (1945a). Arner. J . Bot. 32, 66-72. Cleistogamy and chasmogamy in
Harlan, H. R. (1945b). Amer. J . Bot. 32, 142-148. Natural breeding structure in
Harland, S. C. (1946). Heredity 1, 121-125. An alteration in gene frequency in
Haskell, G. (1953). Heredity 7, 409-418. Quantitative variation i n subsexual
Haskell, G. (1959). Qenetica 30,240-260. Stability andvariation in apomictic Rubus.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1951). Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. 45, 608-635. A comparison of
Heslop-Harrison, J. (19534. Veroff. Geobot. Inst. Rubel fiir 1953,53-82. A synopsis
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1953b). “New Concepts in Flowering Plant Taxonomy”.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1955). I n “Species Studies in the British Flora”, p. 161.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1956). Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. Session 166, 51-83. Some
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1958). Uppsala Uniw. h s s k r . 1958 6, 150-158. EcoIogical
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1959a). Evolution 13, 145-147. Variability and environment.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1959b). Ann. Bpt. N.S. 22,345-349. Photoperiod and fertility
in Rottboellia exaltata L.f.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1959~). “Advances in Botany.” Vol. 1, 891-895. Toronto
University Press. Apomixis, environment and adaptation. Biosystematics
Symposium, 9th Int. Bot. Congress, Montreal.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1961). Phytomorph. 11, 378-383. The function of the glume
pit and the control of cleistogamy in Bothriochloa decipiens.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1962). Symp. SOC. Gen. Microbiol. 12, 14-36. Purposes and
procedures in the taxonomic treatment of higher organisms.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1963). I n “Chemical Plant Taxonomy”. 17-40. London and
New York: Academic Press. Species concepts : theoretical and practical
aspects.
Heywood, V. H. (1959). Systematics Association Publ. No. 3, 87-112. The taxonomic treatment of ecotypic variation.
Hiesey, W. M., Clausen, J. and Keck, D. D. (1942). Amer. Nat. 76,622. Relations
between climate and intraspecific variation in plants.
Hiesey, W. M. (1953). Evolution 7, 297-316. Comparative growth between and
within climatic races of Achillea under controlled conditions.
Hiesey, W. M., Milner H. W. and Nobs, M. A. (1959). Yearb. Curneg. Imtn. 58,
350-353. Controlled cabinets for plant growth.
higher plants.
in genecological trials.
prospects in genecology.
structure and longevity of Festuca rubra L.
than intensive sampling in genecology.
Bromus carinatus Hook, and Am.
the Bromus carinatus complex, as determined by population analyses.
Ricinus communis L due to climatic conditions.
Rubus.
some Swedish and British forms of Orchis maculata L. sens. lat.
of the dactylorchids of the British Isles.
London: Heinemann.
Arbroath: Buncle. The conflict of categories.
observations on Dactylorchis incarmta L.
variation and ethological isolation.
243
Gustafsson, A. (1947). Acta Univ. Lmd. N.F. Avd. 2 42-3, 1-307. Apo&i~ in
Habeck, J. R. (1958). Ecology 39,457-63. White cedar ecotypes in Wisconsin.
Harberd, D. J. (1957). New Phytol. 56, 269-280. The within population variance
Harberd D. J. (1958). Rep. Scot. Plant Breeding Stat. 1958. 52-60. Progem and
Harberd, D. J. (1961a). New Phytol. 60, 18k-206. Observations on population
Harberd, D. J. (1961b). New Phytozl 60, 325-338. The case for extensive rather
Harlan, J. R. (1945a). Arner. J . Bot. 32, 66-72. Cleistogamy and chasmogamy in
Harlan, H. R. (1945b). Amer. J . Bot. 32, 142-148. Natural breeding structure in
Harland, S. C. (1946). Heredity 1, 121-125. An alteration in gene frequency in
Haskell, G. (1953). Heredity 7, 409-418. Quantitative variation i n subsexual
Haskell, G. (1959). Qenetica 30,240-260. Stability andvariation in apomictic Rubus.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1951). Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. 45, 608-635. A comparison of
Heslop-Harrison, J. (19534. Veroff. Geobot. Inst. Rubel fiir 1953,53-82. A synopsis
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1953b). “New Concepts in Flowering Plant Taxonomy”.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1955). I n “Species Studies in the British Flora”, p. 161.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1956). Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. Session 166, 51-83. Some
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1958). Uppsala Uniw. h s s k r . 1958 6, 150-158. EcoIogical
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1959a). Evolution 13, 145-147. Variability and environment.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1959b). Ann. Bpt. N.S. 22,345-349. Photoperiod and fertility
in Rottboellia exaltata L.f.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1959~). “Advances in Botany.” Vol. 1, 891-895. Toronto
University Press. Apomixis, environment and adaptation. Biosystematics
Symposium, 9th Int. Bot. Congress, Montreal.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1961). Phytomorph. 11, 378-383. The function of the glume
pit and the control of cleistogamy in Bothriochloa decipiens.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1962). Symp. SOC. Gen. Microbiol. 12, 14-36. Purposes and
procedures in the taxonomic treatment of higher organisms.
Heslop-Harrison, J. (1963). I n “Chemical Plant Taxonomy”. 17-40. London and
New York: Academic Press. Species concepts : theoretical and practical
aspects.
Heywood, V. H. (1959). Systematics Association Publ. No. 3, 87-112. The taxonomic treatment of ecotypic variation.
Hiesey, W. M., Clausen, J. and Keck, D. D. (1942). Amer. Nat. 76,622. Relations
between climate and intraspecific variation in plants.
Hiesey, W. M. (1953). Evolution 7, 297-316. Comparative growth between and
within climatic races of Achillea under controlled conditions.
Hiesey, W. M., Milner H. W. and Nobs, M. A. (1959). Yearb. Curneg. Imtn. 58,
350-353. Controlled cabinets for plant growth.
higher plants.
in genecological trials.
prospects in genecology.
structure and longevity of Festuca rubra L.
than intensive sampling in genecology.
Bromus carinatus Hook, and Am.
the Bromus carinatus complex, as determined by population analyses.
Ricinus communis L due to climatic conditions.
Rubus.
some Swedish and British forms of Orchis maculata L. sens. lat.
of the dactylorchids of the British Isles.
London: Heinemann.
Arbroath: Buncle. The conflict of categories.
observations on Dactylorchis incarmta L.
variation and ethological isolation.